The DOI matches its Crossref record; 95 of the 95 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Business Groups: An Integrated Model to Focus Future Research
Open accessAbstract
abstract Business groups are the primary form of managing large business organizations outside North America. This paper provides a systematic and integrative framework for understanding business groups. We argue that existing theoretical perspectives of business groups pay attention to four critical external contexts, each of which draws from a specific theoretical perspective: market conditions (transaction cost theory), social relationships (relational perspective), political factors (political economy perspective), and external monitoring mechanisms (agency theory). Business groups adapt to these external forces by deploying various internal mechanisms along two key dimensions: one focuses on the distinctive roles of the group affiliates (horizontal connectedness) and the other focuses on coupling and order between the parent firm and its affiliates (vertical linkages). Based on these two dimensions, a typology of business group forms is developed: network (N‐form), club (C‐form), holding (H‐form), and multidivisional (M‐form). Utilizing this model we provide research questions which facilitate an improved future research agenda.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Coase, R. H. (1937) · Economica · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x · Cited by 23,972
Research in Organizational Behavior
Hammer, E. R., Cummings, L. L., & Staw, B. M. (1984) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258300 · Cited by 10,806
The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage
Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1998.1255632 · Cited by 9,943
Legal Determinants of External Finance
LA PORTA, R., LOPEZ‐DE‐SILANES, F., SHLEIFER, A., & VISHNY, R. W. (1997) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb02727.x · Cited by 9,783
Williamson, O. E. (1975) · Cited by 6,810
The separation of ownership and control in East Asian Corporations
Claessens, S., Djankov, S., & Lang, L. H. P. (2000) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/s0304-405x(00)00067-2 · Cited by 5,754
The new institutionalism in organizational analysis
(1992) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.29-5991 · Cited by 5,470
Educational Organizations as Loosely Coupled Systems
Weick, K. E. (1976) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2391875 · Cited by 5,142
The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage
Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259056 · Cited by 4,773
The ultimate ownership of Western European corporations
Faccio, M., & Lang, L. H. P. (2002) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/s0304-405x(02)00146-0 · Cited by 3,795
Cited by
Cui, L., Meyer, K. E., & Hu, H. W. (2014) · Journal of World Business · doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2013.12.003 · Cited by 332
Metadata
- Authors
- Yiu, D. W., Lu, Y., Bruton, G. D., & Hoskisson, R. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Management Studies
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-12
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1551-1579
- ISSN
- 0022-2380 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-6486
- OpenAlex
- W2170436821
- Cited by
- 295
- References
- 95
- FWCI
- 36.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Business Groups: An Integrated Model to Focus Future Research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00735.x
- The paper
- Yiu, D. W., Lu, Y., Bruton, G. D., & Hoskisson, R. E. (2007). Business Groups: An Integrated Model to Focus Future Research. Journal of Management Studies. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00735.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.