The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Educational Organizations as Loosely Coupled Systems
Abstract
Karl E. Weick In contrast to the prevailing image that elements in organizations are coupled through dense, tight linkages, it is proposed that elements are often tied together frequently and loosely. Using educational organizations as a case in point, it is argued that the concept of loose coupling incorporates a surprising number of disparate observations about organizations, suggests novel functions, creates stubborn problems for methodologists, and generates intriguing questions for scholars. Sample studies of loose coupling are suggested and research priorities are posed to foster cumulative work with this concept.1
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Universities are loosely coupled systems with various units operating largely independently and not reliant on each other, with varying policies and practices to suit local contexts.
“Fourth, campuses, particularly universities, have been noted to be loosely coupled systems with various units operating largely independently and not reliant on eachother with varying policies and practices to suit local contexts (Weick, 1976).”
From Moving Toward Institutional Culture Change in Higher Education: An Exploration into Cross-functional Professional Learning Communities (2025) · cites this paper as Weick, 1976
Higher education campuses exhibit unique features such as loose coupling, being highly values-oriented rather than data-oriented in decision-making, and lacking robust data systems.
“While trends in studies of organizational learning in higher education tend to reflect the general trends across the multi-disciplinary research base, campuses exhibit some unique features such as loose coupling, which makes information flow and communication challenging (Kezar, 2005;Weick, 1976); being highly valuesoriented rather than data-oriented in terms of decision-making (Kezar, 2005); and”
From Moving Toward Institutional Culture Change in Higher Education: An Exploration into Cross-functional Professional Learning Communities (2025) · cites this paper as Weick, 1976
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design
Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554 · Cited by 9,868
Clarifying the Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct and Linking It to Performance
Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1996) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1996.9602161568 · Cited by 10,159
The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits
Hansen, M. T. (1999) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2667032 · Cited by 5,809
Orchestrating Innovation Networks
Dhanaraj, C., & Parkhe, A. (2006) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2006.21318923 · Cited by 1,803
The fit between product market strategy and business model: implications for firm performance
Zott, C., & Amit, R. (2008) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.642 · Cited by 1,731
Ramos‐Rodríguez, A., & Ruíz‐Navarro, J. (2004) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.397 · Cited by 1,626
From smoke and mirrors to walking the talk: Decoupling in the contemporary world
Bromley, P., & Powell, W. W. (2012) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520.2012.684462 · Cited by 1,656
The construction industry as a loosely coupled system: implications for productivity and innovation
Dubois, A., & Gadde, L.-E. (2002) · Construction Management and Economics · doi:10.1080/01446190210163543 · Cited by 1,041
Optimal structure, market dynamism, and the strategy of simple rules
Davis, J. P., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Bingham, C. B. (2009) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2189/asqu.2009.54.3.413 · Cited by 804
“By contrast, moderate structure balances between these two states and so is likely to be high performing (Weick, 1976; Brown and Eisenhardt, 1997).”
BackgroundBelow the Bubble: “Educational Triage” and the Texas Accountability System
Booher-Jennings, J. (2005) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/00028312042002231 · Cited by 762
Glisson, C., & Hemmelgarn, A. (1998) · Child Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1016/s0145-2134(98)00005-2 · Cited by 744
The evolutionary theory of land rights as applied to sub-Saharan Africa: A critical assessment
Platteau, J. (1996) · Development and Change · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7660.1996.tb00578.x · Cited by 687
Drnevich, P. L., & Kriauciunas, A. P. (2011) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.882 · Cited by 681
Christensen, L. T., Morsing, M., & Thyssen, O. (2013) · Organization · doi:10.1177/1350508413478310 · Cited by 591
Toward a Theory of Multi‐Tier Supply Chain Management
Mena, C., Humphries, A., & Choi, T. Y. (2013) · Journal of Supply Chain Management · doi:10.1111/jscm.12003 · Cited by 483
Teachers’ Use of Data: Loose Coupling, Agenda Setting, and Team Norms
Young, V. M. (2006) · American Journal of Education · doi:10.1086/505058 · Cited by 281
Understanding academics' adoption of learning technologies: A systematic review
Liu, Q., Geertshuis, S., & Grainger, R. (2020) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103857 · Cited by 279
Symbolic Power and Organizational Culture
Hallett, T. (2003) · Sociological Theory · doi:10.1111/1467-9558.00181 · Cited by 249
Toward a Core Typology of Service Organizations
Mills, P. K., & Margulies, N. (1980) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1980.4288746 · Cited by 271
The Organizational Structure of Local Environmentalism
Andrews, K., & Edwards, B. (2005) · Mobilization: An International Quarterly · doi:10.17813/maiq.10.2.028028u600744073 · Cited by 200
Handley, S. M., & Benton, W. C. (2013) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2012.12.003 · Cited by 198
Gong, Y., Shenkar, O., Luo, Y., & Nyaw, M. (2007) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.626 · Cited by 192
Teacher Evaluation Policy and Conflicting Theories of Motivation
Firestone, W. A. (2014) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x14521864 · Cited by 159
Mirage of Police Reform: Procedural Justice and Police Legitimacy
University at Albany, S., Worden, R. E., McLean, S. J., & John F. Finn Institute for Public Safety, U. (2017) · Luminos · doi:10.1525/luminos.30 · Cited by 141
Teachers' Decision-Making Power and School Conflict
Ingersoll, R. M. (1996) · Sociology of Education · doi:10.2307/2112804 · Cited by 134
The Learning Spiral: A Process Perspective on Paradox
Raisch, S., Hargrave, T. J., & van de Ven, A. H. (2018) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12397 · Cited by 131
Customization and real time information access in integrated eBusiness supply chain relationships
Klein, R. (2007) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2007.03.001 · Cited by 108
Schudde, L., & Scott-Clayton, J. (2016) · Research in Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s11162-016-9413-3 · Cited by 87
KOMPASS: a method for complementary function allocation in automated work systems
GROTE, G., RYSER, C., WĀLER, T., WINDISCHER, A., & WEIK, S. (2000) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1006/ijhc.1999.0289 · Cited by 80
Scheirer, M. A. (1990) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.2307/2137173 · Cited by 78
Climatic and psychosocial risks of heat illness incidents on construction site
Jia, Y. A., Rowlinson, S., & Ciccarelli, M. (2016) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2015.08.008 · Cited by 70
Tensions across the scales: planning infrastructure for the long-term
Ribes, D., & Finholt, T. A. (2007) · Proceedings of the 2007 international ACM conference on Conference on supporting group work - GROUP '07 · doi:10.1145/1316624.1316659 · Cited by 55
When does virtuality help or hinder teams? Core team characteristics as contingency factors
Schaubroeck, J. M., & Yu, A. (2017) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.12.009 · Cited by 55
Anderson, G. (2017) · International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education · doi:10.1080/09518398.2017.1303211 · Cited by 51
Kezar, A., Hallett, R. E., Corwin, Z. B., & Hypolite, L. (2025) · Innovative Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10755-024-09753-1 · Cited by 50
The balanced scorecard equates interests in healthcare organizations
Funck, E. (2007) · Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change · doi:10.1108/18325910710756122 · Cited by 47
Hänninen, M., & Smedlund, A. (2021) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12701 · Cited by 42
Organizational Control in the High School Workplace: A Theoretical Argument
Bidwell, C. E., & Quiroz, P. A. (1991) · Journal of Research on Adolescence · doi:10.1207/s15327795jra0103_2 · Cited by 34
The learning analytics readiness instrument
Oster, M., Lonn, S., Pistilli, M. D., & Brown, M. G. (2016) · Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge - LAK '16 · doi:10.1145/2883851.2883925 · Cited by 31
The multiple, interacting levels of cognitive systems (MILCS) perspective on group cognition
Goldstone, R. L., & Theiner, G. (2017) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2017.1295635 · Cited by 31
Algorithmic decisions in education governance: Implications and challenges.
Wang, Y. (2024) · Discover Education · doi:10.1007/s44217-024-00337-x · Cited by 18
Examining teacher stress-vulnerability in the US secondary school context.
Fitchett, P. G., McCarthy, C. J., Lambert, R. G., Eyal, M., Playfair, E. C., & Dillard, J. B. (2021) · Educational Review · doi:10.1080/00131911.2019.1619521 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Weick, K. E.
- Venue
- Administrative Science Quarterly
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1976-03
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1
- ISSN
- 0001-8392
- Cited by
- 5,142
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review