The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Learning to Build a Supply Network: An Exploration of Dynamic Business Models
Open accessAbstract
abstract Firms are confronted with the challenge of learning how to develop and manage supply networks, which reduce their operating costs and maximize their effectiveness in the marketplace. In pursuit of such goals they are increasingly turning to the use of dynamic business models. Dynamic business models represent continuous change and therefore make firms learn constantly new and better ways of doing things. These changes are manifestations of inter‐firm knowledge transfer. The aim of this research is to explore dynamic business models as an example of inter‐firm knowledge transfer. Adopting a case study approach, we examine three components of dynamic business models – network structure, inter‐firm routines and knowledge forms – and describe their integration through a problem solving approach to building an offshore supply network. Our empirical findings suggest that dynamic business models help organizations identify and link key actors with each other (at the firm and individual level), and aid the identification and specification of appropriate knowledge types and knowledge transfer mechanisms for different actors, in different contexts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation
Nonaka, I. (1994) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.5.1.14 · Cited by 17,809
Building Theories from Case Study Research
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258557 · Cited by 17,455
Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology
Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.3.3.383 · Cited by 12,939 · cited 1×
“Second, it suggests a constant and iterative need for creating and sharing 'know-how' to drive improvements to both structure and routines (Kogut et al., 1992; Nelson et al., 1982; Teece et al., 1997; Zahra et al., 2006; Zollo et al., 2002).”
Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm
Szulanski, G. (1996) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250171105 · Cited by 7,839
Knowledge Transfer: A Basis for Competitive Advantage in Firms
Argote, L., & Ingram, P. (2000) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1006/obhd.2000.2893 · Cited by 4,164
Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change
Feldman, M. S., & Pentland, B. T. (2003) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3556620 · Cited by 4,020
Entrepreneurship and dynamic capabilities: a review, model and research agenda
Zahra, S. A., Sapienza, H. J., & Davidsson, P. (2006) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00616.x · Cited by 3,152
Schmooze or lose: Social friction and lubrication in e-mail negotiations.
Morris, M., Nadler, J., Kurtzberg, T., & Thompson, L. (2002) · Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice · doi:10.1037/1089-2699.6.1.89 · Cited by 207
Cited by
Business models for sustainable innovation: state-of-the-art and steps towards a research agenda
Boons, F., & Lüdeke-Freund, F. (2013) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.007 · Cited by 2,469
Bidmon, C. M., & Knab, S. F. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.198 · Cited by 260
Metadata
- Authors
- Mason, K. J., & Leek, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Management Studies
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-05-02
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 774-799
- ISSN
- 0022-2380 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-6486
- OpenAlex
- W2158623793
- Cited by
- 206
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 34.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Learning to Build a Supply Network: An Exploration of Dynamic Business Models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00769.x
- The paper
- Mason, K. J., & Leek, S. (2008). Learning to Build a Supply Network: An Exploration of Dynamic Business Models. Journal of Management Studies. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00769.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.