The DOI matches its Crossref record.
CORRELATING PERSONS INSTEAD OF TESTS
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“we have chosen to apply a mixed-method approach called Q-methodology, as it offers a rigorous and systematic way for capturing human subjectivity (Mettler and Wulf 2018;Stephenson 1935Stephenson , 1986)).”
From How affordances of chatbots cross the chasm between social and traditional enterprise systems (2020) · cites this paper as Stephenson 1935
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Doing Q ethodology: theory, method and interpretation
Watts, S., & Stenner, P. H. D. (2005) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1191/1478088705qp022oa · Cited by 1,256
“Qualitative methodologists have rightly challenged the currently extant ‘scientific’ or hypothetico-deductive approach in psychology, but (and despite its quantitative content) it is important to recognize that Stephenson’s Q methodology was actually performing a similar function long before any significant qualitativ…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialBrown, S. R. (1993) · Universiteitsbibliotheek EUR · doi:10.15133/j.os.1993.002 · Cited by 733
Modeling Intraindividual Change in Personality Traits: Findings From the Normative Aging Study
Mroczek, D. K., & Spiro, A. (2003) · The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences · doi:10.1093/geronb/58.3.p153 · Cited by 393
“The notion of person-level change was introduced by Stephenson (1936) and elaborated on by Cattell (1950, 1966; see also McArdle & Woodcock, 1997; Mehta & West, 2000; Nesselroade, 1988, 1991).”
BackgroundRescorla, L., Ginzburg, S., Achenbach, T., Ivanova, M., Almqvist, F., Begovac, I., Bilenberg, N., Bird, H., Chahed, M., Dobrean, A., et al. (2013) · Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology · doi:10.1080/15374416.2012.717870 · Cited by 303
“Third, we computed a Q correlation between the 98 mean CBCL item ratings and the 98 mean YSR item ratings within each society, based on the procedures pioneered by Stephenson (1935, 1953) whereby Pearson correlations are calculated between informants across items.”
MethodThe three basic factor-analytic research designs—their interrelations and derivatives.
Cattell, R. B. (1952) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0054245 · Cited by 336
Metadata
- Authors
- STEPHENSON, W.
- Affiliations
- University College London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- STEPHENSON, W.
- ORCID
- STEPHENSON, W.
- Venue
- Journal of Personality
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1935-09
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 17-24
- ISSN
- 0022-3506 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-6494
- OpenAlex
- W2028674112
- Cited by
- 475
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 1.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Personality (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Keywords
- person-centered approach, personality assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
