Cited by 393Personality Traits and PsychologyAging and Gerontology ResearchPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

Modeling Intraindividual Change in Personality Traits: Findings From the Normative Aging Study

Mroczek, D. K., Spiro, A.·2003·The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences

Abstract

To advance an intraindividual life-span approach to the issue of stability and change, we studied personality trait trajectories in adulthood. Growth curves for extraversion and neuroticism were estimated for over 1600 men (initially aged 43-91) in the Normative Aging Study, who were followed over 12 years. We found significant individual differences in intraindividual change for both traits, as well as different trajectories for extraversion and neuroticism. The overall extraversion trajectory was best defined by a linear model, but neuroticism was characterized by quadratic decline with age. We then considered several variables as predictors of individual differences around these overall trajectories. Birth cohort, marriage or remarriage, death of spouse, and memory complaints were all significant predictors, explaining variability in both level and rate of personality trait change. These findings suggest that there is a good deal of variability in personality trajectories, and that some of this variability can be explained by birth cohort as well as by age-graded life events.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/geronb/58.3.p153

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mroczek, D. K., & Spiro, A.
Affiliations
  • Fordham University (US)
  • Boston University (US)
Corresponding author
Mroczek, D. K.
Venue
The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
Published
2003-05-01
Volume
58
Issue
3
Pages
P153-P165
ISSN
  • 1079-5014 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-5368
OpenAlex
W2130347526
Cited by
393
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 23
FWCI
18.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series B (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Brandeis University
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01aa008941-04, 1r03ag016054-01)
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R01-AA08941)
  • National Institute on Aging (5 T32 AG 00030, R03-AG16054, R01 AG 18436, T32AG00030, R01AG018436, R01AG02237, AG00030., R01AG013006, R01-AG13006)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
personality trait change, within-person change, extraversion, neuroticism, aging, individual differences, birth cohort effects, death of a spouse, memory impairment, life events
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Extraversion, Psychological, Female, Humans, Individuality, Life Change Events, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Memory, Middle Aged, Neurotic Disorders, Personality Development, Personality Inventory, Psychometrics, United States, Veterans, Cohort Studies, Linear Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review