The DOI matches its Crossref record.
CORRELATING PERSONS INSTEAD OF TESTS
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“we have chosen to apply a mixed-method approach called Q-methodology, as it offers a rigorous and systematic way for capturing human subjectivity (Mettler and Wulf 2018;Stephenson 1935Stephenson , 1986)).”
From How affordances of chatbots cross the chasm between social and traditional enterprise systems (2020) · cites this paper as Stephenson 1935
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Doing Q ethodology: theory, method and interpretation
Watts, S., & Stenner, P. H. D. (2005) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1191/1478088705qp022oa · Cited by 1,256
“Qualitative methodologists have rightly challenged the currently extant ‘scientific’ or hypothetico-deductive approach in psychology, but (and despite its quantitative content) it is important to recognize that Stephenson’s Q methodology was actually performing a similar function long before any significant qualitativ…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialBrown, S. R. (1993) · Universiteitsbibliotheek EUR · doi:10.15133/j.os.1993.002 · Cited by 733
Modeling Intraindividual Change in Personality Traits: Findings From the Normative Aging Study
Mroczek, D. K., & Spiro, A. (2003) · The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences · doi:10.1093/geronb/58.3.p153 · Cited by 393
“The notion of person-level change was introduced by Stephenson (1936) and elaborated on by Cattell (1950, 1966; see also McArdle & Woodcock, 1997; Mehta & West, 2000; Nesselroade, 1988, 1991).”
BackgroundRescorla, L., Ginzburg, S., Achenbach, T., Ivanova, M., Almqvist, F., Begovac, I., Bilenberg, N., Bird, H., Chahed, M., Dobrean, A., et al. (2013) · Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology · doi:10.1080/15374416.2012.717870 · Cited by 303
“Third, we computed a Q correlation between the 98 mean CBCL item ratings and the 98 mean YSR item ratings within each society, based on the procedures pioneered by Stephenson (1935, 1953) whereby Pearson correlations are calculated between informants across items.”
MethodThe three basic factor-analytic research designs—their interrelations and derivatives.
Cattell, R. B. (1952) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0054245 · Cited by 336
Q-Methodology in Nursing Research
Akhtar‐Danesh, N., Baumann, A. O., & Cordingley, L. (2008) · Western Journal of Nursing Research · doi:10.1177/0193945907312979 · Cited by 291
“William Stephenson (1935a) introduced the method in 1935, followed by additional publications (Stephenson, 1935b, 1936, 1953).”
MethodCuppen, E. H. W. J., Breukers, S., Hisschemoller, M., & Bergsma, E. (2009) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.09.005 · Cited by 283
“Q methodology was developed originally in the 1930s as an innovative way to study people's subjectivity (Stephenson, 1935; Brown, 1980).”
MethodGruber, J. S. (2008) · Environmental Management · doi:10.1007/s00267-008-9235-y · Cited by 249
Eccleston, C., Williams, A. C. D. C., & Rogers, W. S. (1997) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(96)00404-2 · Cited by 229
Silvius, G., Kampinga, M., Paniagua, S., & Mooi, H. G. (2017) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.01.011 · Cited by 238
Yavchitz, A., Ravaud, P., Altman, D. G., Moher, D., Hrobjartsson, A., Lasserson, T., & Boutron, I. (2016) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.01.020 · Cited by 224
Diversity and constructive conflict in stakeholder dialogue: considerations for design and methods
Cuppen, E. H. W. J. (2011) · Policy Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11077-011-9141-7 · Cited by 246
“Q methodology (Stephenson 1935; Brown 1980; McKeown and Thomas 1988) was developed as a method to study subjectivity.”
MethodParent–Teacher Agreement on Children's Problems in 21 Societies
Rescorla, L. A., Bochicchio, L. A., Achenbach, T. M., Ivanova, M. Y., Almqvist, F., Begovac, I., Bilenberg, N., Bird, H., Dobrean, A., Erol, N., et al. (2014) · Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology · doi:10.1080/15374416.2014.900719 · Cited by 197
“correlation between the 90 mean CBCL item ratings and the 90 mean TRF item ratings within each society, based on the procedures pioneered by Stephenson (1935), whereby Pearson correlations are calculated between informants across items.”
MethodCounseling theory and practice.
Pepinsky, H. B., & Pepinsky, P. N. (1954) · doi:10.1037/10631-000 · Cited by 193
Monaco, G. L., Piermattéo, A., Rateau, P., & Tavani, J. (2016) · Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour · doi:10.1111/jtsb.12124 · Cited by 195
“The characterization questionnaire is an adaptation of the Q. Sort method (Stephenson, 1935) to the study of the structural approach of SRs (Flament, 1981).”
MethodCuppen, E. H. W. J., Bosch-Rekveldt, M. G. C., Pikaar, E., & Mehos, D. C. (2016) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.01.003 · Cited by 183
“Originally developed for psychological research (Stephenson, 1935), Q methodology is gaining growing recognition and application in policy and planning investigations (Cuppen, Breukers, Hisschemöller, & Bergsma, 2010); (Ellis et al., 2007; Setiawan & Cuppen, 2013; Van Eeten, 2001; Wolsink &…”
MethodDistal focussing of perception: Size-constancy in a representative sample of situations.
Brunswik, E. (1944) · The Psychological Monographs · doi:10.1037/h0093505 · Cited by 158
The stability of the self-concept in adolescence.
Engel, M. (1959) · Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0043088 · Cited by 153
van Exel, J. N. A., Baker, R. M., Mason, H., Donaldson, C., & Brouwer, W. B. F. (2014) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.12.023 · Cited by 150
“Q methodology combines qualitative and quantitative methods and provides a scientific foundation for the systematic study of subjectivity (Stephenson, 1935; Brown, 1980; Watts & Stenner, 2012; McKeown & Thomas, 2013).”
MethodBrunswik, E. (1949) · Project Euclid (Cornell University) · Cited by 141
Examining Perceptions and Attitudes
Ho, G. W. K. (2016) · Western Journal of Nursing Research · doi:10.1177/0193945916661302 · Cited by 121
“Q-methodology was developed by William Stephenson to empirically study human subjectivity (Stephenson, 1935), and it is based on the notion that subjectivity is both communicable and self-referent (McKeown & Thomas, 2013).”
MethodJedeloo, S., van Staa, A., Latour, J. M., et al. (2009) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.10.006 · Cited by 117
“Q-methodology (Brown, 1980; Stephenson, 1935) was chosen because it allows identifying preference profiles of adolescents with a variety of chronic conditions sharing common viewpoints and to describe similarities and differences between these profiles.”
MethodProfiling Chinese university students’ motivation to learn multiple languages
Zheng, Y., Lu, X., & Ren, W. (2019) · Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development · doi:10.1080/01434632.2019.1571074 · Cited by 114
Zheng, Y., Lu, X., & Ren, W. (2020) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/modl.12672 · Cited by 114
Swedeen, P. (2005) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.04.003 · Cited by 95
van Exel, J. N. A., de Graaf, G., & Brouwer, W. B. F. (2007) · Health Policy · doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2007.02.002 · Cited by 92
Q-methodology and tourism research
Stergiou, D. P., & Airey, D. (2010) · Current Issues in Tourism · doi:10.1080/13683500.2010.537316 · Cited by 87
“Now almost three quarters of a century old (Stephenson, 1935), Q-methodology can hardly lay claim to the status of a new method for conducting research in the social sciences.”
MethodSome observations on Q technique.
Stephenson, W. (1952) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0057171 · Cited by 86
Self-citationThe Q-sort method and the study of personality development.
Ozer, D. J. (1993) · American Psychological Association eBooks · doi:10.1037/10127-023 · Cited by 85
Naspetti, S., Mandolesi, S., Buysse, J., Latvala, T., Nicholas, P., Padel, S., Loo, E. J. V., & Zanoli, R. (2017) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su9101805 · Cited by 84
“Preliminary qualitative research using Q methodology [11,12] was aimed at identifying objectives and expectations along the dairy chain in terms of innovation, which resulted in the identification of various viewpoints in terms of acceptable innovations along the supply chain.”
MethodA Comparison between Major Factor Extraction and Factor Rotation Techniques in Q-Methodology
Akhtar‐Danesh, N. (2017) · Open Journal of Applied Sciences · doi:10.4236/ojapps.2017.74013 · Cited by 83
“Q-methodology was introduced in 1935 by Stephenson [2] [3] and is used to identify common attitudes, perceptions, preferences, and feelings among a group of participants.”
MethodNurse Faculty Perceptions of Simulation Use in Nursing Education
Akhtar‐Danesh, N., Baxter, P. E., Valaitis, R. K., Stanyon, W., & Sproul, S. (2008) · Western Journal of Nursing Research · doi:10.1177/0193945908328264 · Cited by 82
Simulated experiences: Nursing students share their perspectives
Baxter, P. E., Akhtar‐Danesh, N., Valaitis, R. K., Stanyon, W., & Sproul, S. (2009) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2009.05.003 · Cited by 78
Rukai indigenous tourism: Representations, cultural identity and Q method
Hunter, W. C. (2010) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2010.03.003 · Cited by 81
Statistical Methodology: VII. Q‐Methodology, a Structural Analytic Approach to Medical Subjectivity
Barbosa, J. C., Willoughby, P. J., Rosenberg, C. A., et al. (1998) · Academic Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1553-2712.1998.tb02786.x · Cited by 75
Service Quality in Higher Education: The Experience of Overseas Students
Pereda, M. (2007) · Journal of Hospitality Leisure Sport & Tourism Education · doi:10.3794/johlste.62.160 · Cited by 74
“Q-technique has its origins in the work of Stephenson (1935; 1953) and provides researchers with a systematic and orderly means for identifying the dimensions of subjective phenomena from the viewpoints and experiences of individuals.”
Methodvan Exel, J. N. A., de Graaf, G., & Brouwer, W. B. F. (2006) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.06.028 · Cited by 74
van Hooft, S. M., Dwarswaard, J., Jedeloo, S., Bal, R. A., & van Staa, A. (2014) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.07.004 · Cited by 73
Stakeholders’ perspectives on future electric vehicle charging infrastructure developments
Wolbertus, R., Jansen, S., & Kroesen, M. (2020) · Futures · doi:10.1016/j.futures.2020.102610 · Cited by 69
What motivates visitors to participate in a gamified trip? A player typology using Q methodology
Shen, Y., Choi, H. C., Joppe, M., & Yi, S. (2020) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2019.104074 · Cited by 76
Gaps or bridges in multicultural teacher education: A Q study of attitudes toward student diversity
Yang, Y., & Montgomery, D. M. (2012) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2012.10.003 · Cited by 66
“In contrast, embodying both qualitative and quantitative components, Q methodology has the power to effectively capture attitudes with its unobtrusive, person-based, and forced Q sorting distribution approach (Brown, 1980; Cross, 2005; Stephenson, 1935).”
BackgroundMethodUsing visual Q sorting to determine the impact of photovoltaic applications on the landscape
Naspetti, S., Mandolesi, S., & Zanoli, R. (2016) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.06.021 · Cited by 66
Overly ambitious critics and the Medici Effect: a reply to Kampen and Tamás
Brown, S. R., Danielson, S., & van Exel, J. N. A. (2014) · Quality & Quantity · doi:10.1007/s11135-014-0007-x · Cited by 65
Gender and Attachment Representations in the Preschool Years
Pierrehumbert, B., Santelices, M. P., Ibáñez, M., Alberdi, M., Ongari, B., Roskam, I., Stiévenart, M., Spencer, R., Fresno, A., & Borghini, A. (2009) · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology · doi:10.1177/0022022109335181 · Cited by 66
Bohnenberger, K. (2020) · Journal of Housing and the Built Environment · doi:10.1007/s10901-020-09762-4 · Cited by 64
“The method was developed in the 1930s by William Stephenson as a variation of factor analysis (Stephenson 1935a, b).”
MethodPrincipal’s perceptions of effective professional development in schools
Brown, C., & Militello, M. (2016) · Journal of Educational Administration · doi:10.1108/jea-09-2014-0109 · Cited by 103
Chauvin, A., Ravaud, P., Baron, G., Barnes, C., & Boutron, I. (2015) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12916-015-0395-3 · Cited by 64
“Sorting tasks With Q-sort, participants classify the importance of each task relative to other tasks [23].”
MethodIntroduction to inverted factor analysis, with some applications to studies in orexis.
Stephenson, W. (1936) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0058705 · Cited by 59
Self-citationDemocracy and Chinese Political Discourses
Peng, Y. (1998) · Modern China · doi:10.1177/009770049802400403 · Cited by 60
A comparison between ipsative and normative ratings of personality.
Block, J. H. (1957) · Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0044466 · Cited by 55
Valaitis, R. K., Akhtar‐Danesh, N., Brooks, F. M., Binks, S., & Semogas, D. (2011) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05582.x · Cited by 58
How affordances of chatbots cross the chasm between social and traditional enterprise systems
Stoeckli, E., Dremel, C., Uebernickel, F., & Brenner, W. (2020) · Electronic Markets · doi:10.1007/s12525-019-00359-6 · Cited by 55
“P-set recruitment procedure Q-Methodology studies are conducted with a relatively small number of participants (Stephenson 1935; Van Exel and De Graaf 2005) that is usually smaller than the Q-set of statements (Brouwer 1999) and that enables the comparison of the resulting factors with each another…”
MethodQfactor: A Command for Q-methodology Analysis
Akhtar‐Danesh, N. (2018) · The Stata Journal Promoting communications on statistics and Stata · doi:10.1177/1536867x1801800209 · Cited by 53
Debiasing the supplier selection decision: a taxonomy and conceptualization
Kaufmann, L., Carter, C. R., & Buhrmann, C. (2010) · International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management · doi:10.1108/09600031011093214 · Cited by 53
Perceptions of Professionalism Among Nursing Faculty and Nursing Students
Akhtar‐Danesh, N., Baumann, A. O., Kolotylo, C. J., et al. (2011) · Western Journal of Nursing Research · doi:10.1177/0193945911408623 · Cited by 52
“Although Q-methodology was introduced in 1935 (Stephenson, 1935a, 1935b) and has been used sporadically since then, it is now becoming a more widely used and accepted research method because of the recent advances in its statistical analytic component (McKeown & Thomas, 1988).”
MethodThing constancy as measured by correlation coefficients.
Brunswik, E. (1940) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0057921 · Cited by 52
Boot, C. R. L., Deeg, D. J. H., Abma, T., Rijs, K. J., van der Pas, S., van Tilburg, T. G., & van der Beek, A. J. (2013) · Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation · doi:10.1007/s10926-013-9489-y · Cited by 50
“[6, 9, 23, 24].”
MethodGruber, J. (2011) · Conservation and Society · doi:10.4103/0972-4923.83725 · Cited by 51
“This methodology was originally developed by William Stephenson (Stephenson 1935) in order to assess individuals’ priorities about an issue.”
MethodEducational Psychology: Using Insights from Implicit Attitude Measures
Glock, S., & Kovacs, C. (2013) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-013-9241-3 · Cited by 59
“Another less commonly applied explicit attitude measurement method is Q sorting (Stephenson 1935).”
MethodWard, L. C. (2013) · Geoforum · doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2012.12.004 · Cited by 50
Using Q Methodology in Administrative Ethics
de Graaf, G., & van Exel, J. N. A. (2008) · Public Integrity · doi:10.2753/pin1099-9922110104 · Cited by 50
“Stephenson (1935, 18–19) presented Q methodology as an inversion of conventional factor analysis in the sense that Q correlates persons instead of tests.”
BackgroundMethod“I can do perfectly well without a car!”
van Exel, J. N. A., de Graaf, G., & Rietveld, P. (2010) · Transportation · doi:10.1007/s11116-010-9315-8 · Cited by 49
“Q-methodology is perhaps fairly novel in transportation research, but it has been around for about 75 years (Stephenson 1935) and is well-established in the political and social sciences (De Graaf 2005; 2001; De Graaf and van Exel 2009; Durning 1999; Ellis et al. 2007; Niemeyer et al. 2005;…”
Niedziałkowski, K., Komar, E., Pietrzyk‐Kaszyńska, A., Olszańska, A., & Grodzińska‐Jurczak, M. (2017) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.11.018 · Cited by 52
“Q methodology is a research method proposed by William Stephenson (1935) to quantitatively study individuals' subjectivity.”
MethodBuljac‐Samardžić, M., Clark, M. A., van Exel, J. N. A., & van Wijngaarden, J. D. H. (2021) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.13358 · Cited by 46
“Q‐methodology is particularly useful for the purpose of this study because it combines aspects of qualitative and quantitative methods for an in‐depth study of potentially complex and diverse subjective topics, such as patient perspectives.(39,40) The core of the data collection consists of respondents reading, evalua…”
MethodHow employment support and social integration programmes are viewed by the intellectually disabled
Cramm, J. M., Finkenflügel, H., Kuijsten, R., & van Exel, J. N. A. (2009) · Journal of Intellectual Disability Research · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2788.2009.01168.x · Cited by 49
Metaverse and tourism development: issues and opportunities in stakeholders’ perception
Fazio, G., Fricano, S., Iannolino, S., & Pirrone, C. (2023) · Information Technology & Tourism · doi:10.1007/s40558-023-00268-7 · Cited by 48
“Developed by William Stephenson in the 1930s (Stephenson 1935), Q-methodology was initially designed to investigate subjectivity (e.g., attitudes, viewpoints, perspectives, etc.) because it can provide a robust and efficient method to reveal consensus or disagreement among respondent.”
BackgroundMethodExploring IT entrepreneurs' dynamic capabilities using Q‐technique
Chang, C. (2012) · Industrial Management & Data Systems · doi:10.1108/02635571211264627 · Cited by 47
Iofrıda, N., Luca, A. I. D., Gulısano, G., & Strano, A. (2018) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2018.01.020 · Cited by 46
Understanding resident subjectivities toward tourism using Q method: Orchid Island, Taiwan
Hunter, W. C. (2012) · Journal of Sustainable Tourism · doi:10.1080/09669582.2012.685175 · Cited by 44
“This study employs Q method, a qualitative technique used to identify the opinions, beliefs and attitudes that make up a social discourse (Barry & Proops, 1999; Stephenson, 1935).”
Methodvan Eijnatten, F. M., van der Ark, L. A., & Holloway, S. S. (2014) · Quality & Quantity · doi:10.1007/s11135-014-0009-8 · Cited by 46
“Since then, forced-choice, self-report questionnaire formats have been further developed (Stephenson 1935; Allport 1937; Cattell 1944), and used in all sorts of psychological testing: For instance, the measurement of personality (Gordon 1951; Johnson et al. 1988; Matthews and Oddy 1997; Bowen et…”
MethodEmerging Technologies of Text Mining: Techniques and Applications
do Prado, H. A., & Ferneda, E. (2007) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 44
Impact of factor rotation on Q-methodology analysis
Akhtar‐Danesh, N. (2023) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0290728 · Cited by 43
“Q-methodology was introduced by Stephenson in 1935 [10,11] as a research methodology and is used to identify shared and salient viewpoints among study participants.”
MethodParents’ perceptions and attitudes on childhood obesity: A Q‐methodology study
Akhtar‐Danesh, N., Dehghan, M., Morrison, K. M., et al. (2011) · Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners · doi:10.1111/j.1745-7599.2010.00584.x · Cited by 42
“Although introduced in 1935 by Stephenson (Stephenson, 1935a, 1935b), Q-methodology has recently been more widely used as a result of advances in the statistical analysis component (McKeown & Thomas, 1988).”
MethodUnderstanding Science in Conservation: A Q Method Approach on the Galápagos Islands
Cairns, R. (2012) · Conservation and Society · doi:10.4103/0972-4923.101835 · Cited by 45
A quasi-experimental evaluation of learning in a stakeholder dialogue on bio-energy
Cuppen, E. H. W. J. (2012) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.12.006 · Cited by 45
Stakeholder perspectives on carbon capture and storage in Indonesia
Setiawan, A. D., & Cuppen, E. H. W. J. (2013) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.057 · Cited by 46
Q-methodology as a research and design tool for HCI
O'Leary, K., Wobbrock, J. O., & Riskin, E. A. (2013) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2470654.2466256 · Cited by 40
“Stephenson [21,22], the inventor of Q-methodology, outlined three rules for ensuring statistical soundness in a Q-methodology research design that pertain to sampling population of the statements in the Q-set: (1) homogeneity in kind; (2) heterogeneity among items of a kind; and (3) subjectivity.”
MethodApplying Q-Methodology to Investigate People’ Preferences for Multivariate Stimuli
Gao, J., & Soranzo, A. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.556509 · Cited by 42
van de Kerkhof, M., Cuppen, E. H. W. J., & Hisschemoller, M. (2008) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2008.07.004 · Cited by 44
Implementation of the EU Nitrates Directive in the Republic of Ireland — A view from the farm
Buckley, C. (2012) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.02.031 · Cited by 40
“Q methodology was first pioneered by William Stephenson (1935) and encompasses a distinctive set of psychometric and operational principles that when combined with the statistical application of factor analysis provides the researcher with a systematic”
MethodFive Ways to Make a Difference: Perceptions of Practitioners Working in Urban Neighborhoods
Durose, C., van Hulst, M., Jeffares, S., et al. (2015) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/puar.12502 · Cited by 39
Johnson, E. Z. (1952) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/1097-4679(195207)8:3 · Cited by 12
Self-citationBogat, G. A., von Eye, A., & Bergman, L. R. (2016) · doi:10.1002/9781119125556.devpsy118 · Cited by 43
Alexithymia and Psychopathy: Comparison and Application of California Q-set Prototypes
Haviland, M. G., Sonne, J. L., & Kowert, P. A. (2004) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa8203_06 · Cited by 38
“, “R”) methodology one would then seek correlations among test items administered to the sample population, the objective with Q-methodology, as its earliest proponent (Stephenson, 1935) put it, is to seek correlations among “persons rather than tests” (also see Allport, 1937, 1962).”
MethodAttitudes towards oral health among parents of 6‐year‐old children at risk of developing caries
Vermaire, J. H., Hoogstraten, J., van Loveren, C., Poorterman, J. H. G., & van Exel, J. N. A. (2010) · Community Dentistry And Oral Epidemiology · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0528.2010.00558.x · Cited by 37
“Q-methodology originated in the 1930s (Stephenson, 1935)1 and many of its studies have been published in the fields of social and political science.”
MethodEffective Retention Strategies for Midcareer Critical Care Nurses
Lobo, V. M., Fisher, A., Baumann, A. O., et al. (2012) · Nursing Research · doi:10.1097/nnr.0b013e31825b69b1 · Cited by 37
“Q methodology was first introduced in 1935 by Stephenson but has been embraced more widely only in recent decades because of the advances in the statistical analysis component of the method (McKeown & Thomas, 1988; Stephenson, 1935).”
MethodWallenburg, I., van Exel, J. N. A., Stolk, E. A., et al. (2010) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0b013e3181dc1f0f · Cited by 37
Boot, C. R. L., van Exel, N. J. A., & van der Gulden, J. W. J. (2009) · Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation · doi:10.1007/s10926-009-9185-0 · Cited by 36
“By ranking the statements people give their subjective meaning to the Q-set, and thus reveal their subjective viewpoint [23].”
BackgroundBijnsdorp, F. M., Pasman, H. R. W., Boot, C. R. L., van Hooft, S. M., van Staa, A., & Francke, A. L. (2020) · BMC Palliative Care · doi:10.1186/s12904-020-00560-x · Cited by 38
Cramm, J. M., van Exel, J. N. A., Møller, V., & Finkenflügel, H. (2010) · Patient · doi:10.2165/11531900-000000000-00000 · Cited by 36
Valaitis, R. K., Akhtar‐Danesh, N., Eva, K. W., et al. (2007) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.9.5.e39 · Cited by 36
Mandolesi, S., Nicholas, P., Naspetti, S., et al. (2015) · Food Policy · doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2015.04.008 · Cited by 35
A factorial study of emotionality in the dog.
Royce, J. R. (1955) · The Psychological Monographs · doi:10.1037/h0093736 · Cited by 35
The vulnerability of mussel aquaculture: Understanding environmental threats and future directions
Soliño, M., & Figueras, A. J. (2025) · Aquaculture · doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2025.742196 · Cited by 34
Reconceptualizing Intuition in Supply Chain Management
Carter, C. R., Kaufmann, L., & Wagner, C. M. (2017) · Journal of Business Logistics · doi:10.1111/jbl.12154 · Cited by 37
A Q‐methodological study of lesbian identities
Kitzinger, C., & Rogers, R. S. (1985) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420150204 · Cited by 34
Where "Does" the Buck Stop?: Assessing the Impact of Presidential Personality
Kowert, P. A. (1996) · Political Psychology · doi:10.2307/3791963 · Cited by 33
Godor, B. P. (2021) · The Teacher Educator · doi:10.1080/08878730.2020.1785068 · Cited by 52
“Q Methodology, as outlined by Stephenson (1935), aims at exploring “correlating persons instead of tests (1935, p. 17).””
MethodUnderstanding stakeholder preferences for future biogas development in Germany
Venus, T. E., Venus, T. E., Strauss, F., et al. (2021) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105704 · Cited by 32
Kraijo, H., Brouwer, W. B. F., de Leeuw, R., Schrijvers, G., & van Exel, J. N. A. (2011) · Dementia · doi:10.1177/1471301211421261 · Cited by 32
“This type of research is relatively new to the field of health care but has been widely used in other areas of policy research during the last 70 years (Stephenson, 1935; Brown, 1980; 1993).”
Method
Metadata
- Authors
- STEPHENSON, W.
- Affiliations
- University College London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- STEPHENSON, W.
- ORCID
- STEPHENSON, W.
- Venue
- Journal of Personality
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1935-09
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 17-24
- ISSN
- 0022-3506 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-6494
- OpenAlex
- W2028674112
- Cited by
- 475
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 1.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Personality (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Keywords
- person-centered approach, personality assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review