Cited by 427Resilience and Mental HealthGender Roles and Identity StudiesProblem Solving Skills Development

Gender, appraisal, and coping: a longitudinal analysis

Ptacek, J. T., Smith, Ronald E., Zanas, John·1992·Journal of Personality

Abstract

ABSTRACT For 21 consecutive days, 186 male and female college students recalled the most stressful event of the day, recorded how the event was appraised, and indicated the coping methods they employed as well as their perceived effectiveness and the sequence in which they were used. Gender differences in seven coping strategies were examined in terms of frequency of use, extent of use, relative use, and the frequency with which each method was used first in the coping sequence. The gender differences that emerged were consistent with a socialization hypothesis that predicts more problem‐focused coping in men and more use of support seeking and emotion‐focused coping in women. Both men and women rated problem‐focused coping responses as more generally effective than seeking social support, and the latter as more effective than emotion‐focused coping responses. Additionally, we explored the roles of stressor type and of threat, challenge, and control appraisals in the observed gender differences.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00272.x

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ptacek, J. T., Smith, R. E., & Zanas, J.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Ptacek, J. T.
Venue
Journal of Personality
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1992-12
Volume
60
Issue
4
Pages
747-770
ISSN
  • 0022-3506 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-6494
OpenAlex
W2054129739
Cited by
427
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 27
FWCI
5.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Personality (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Roles and Identity Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Problem Solving Skills Development
Keywords
gender differences, coping strategies, stress appraisal, threat appraisal, challenge appraisal, control appraisal, problem-focused coping, emotion-focused coping, social support seeking, coping effectiveness, stressor type, university students, socialization hypothesis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review