Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 501

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 73 of the 73 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Approach and Avoidance Social Motives and Goals

Gable, Shelly L.·2006·Journal of Personality

Abstract

ABSTRACT It was predicted that approach social motives and goals would be linked to outcomes characterized by the presence of positive social features, and avoidance social motives and goals would be linked to outcomes characterized by the presence of negative social features and that the link between approach motives and outcomes would be mediated by different processes than the link between avoidance motives and outcomes. These hypotheses were examined in three studies (two of them longitudinal) that measured participants' dispositional social motives, short‐term social goals, and social outcomes (e.g., loneliness). Approach motives and goals were reliably associated with less loneliness and more satisfaction with social bonds, whereas avoidance motives and goals were reliably associated with more loneliness, negative social attitudes, and relationship insecurity. Results also suggested that these associations were mediated by different processes. Implications for the conceptualization of close relationships along these two dimensions are discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00373.x

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 73 references

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. 10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497 · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497 · Paper page
  2. 10.1037/0022-3514.65.5.1061 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.5.1061 · Paper page
  3. Derryberry D., 1994, Temperament and attention, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 1128, 10.1037/0022-3514.66.6.1128 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1037/0022-3514.72.1.218 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.461 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1037/0022-3514.73.1.171 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1037/0022-3514.75.5.1282 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1037/0022-3514.51.5.1058 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Fincham F. D., 1997, A new look at marital quality, Journal of Family Psychology, 11, 489, 10.1037/0893-3200.11.4.489-502 · doi:10.1037/0893-3200.11.4.489-502 · Paper page
  10. Fowles D. C., 1994, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, Vol. 41: Integrative views of motivation, cognition, and emotion, 181
  11. Gable S. L., 2001, Close romantic relationship maintenance and enhancement, 169
  12. 10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1310 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1310 · Paper page
  13. Jackson D. N., 1974, Personality Research Form manual
  14. Lewin K., 1935, A dynamic theory of personality
  15. 10.1037/0022-3514.72.4.855 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Perlman D., 1981, Personal relationships. 3: Personal relationships in disorder, 31
  17. Schneirla T. C., 1959, An evolutionary and developmental theory of biphasic processes underlying approach and withdrawal, 1
  18. 10.1037/h0059738 · doi:10.1037/h0059738

Cited by

See all 501

Metadata

Authors
Gable, S. L.
Venue
Journal of Personality
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-12-15
Volume
74
Issue
1
Pages
175-222
ISSN
  • 0022-3506 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-6494
OpenAlex
W1991516983
Cited by
501
References
73
FWCI
10.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Approach and Avoidance Social Motives and Goals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00373.x
The paper
Gable, S. L. (2006). Approach and Avoidance Social Motives and Goals. Journal of Personality. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00373.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.