Cited by 2,144Health disparities and outcomesDeath Anxiety and Social ExclusionAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Perceived social isolation and cognition

Open access
Cacioppo, John T., Hawkley, Louise C.·2009·Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Abstract

Social species, from Drosophila melanogaster to Homo sapiens, fare poorly when isolated. Homo sapiens, an irrepressibly meaning-making species, are, in normal circumstances, dramatically affected by perceived social isolation. Research indicates that perceived social isolation (i.e. loneliness) is a risk factor for, and may contribute to, poorer overall cognitive performance, faster cognitive decline, poorer executive functioning, increased negativity and depressive cognition, heightened sensitivity to social threats, a confirmatory bias in social cognition that is self-protective and paradoxically self-defeating, heightened anthropomorphism and contagion that threatens social cohesion. These differences in attention and cognition impact on emotions, decisions, behaviors and interpersonal interactions that can contribute to the association between loneliness and cognitive decline and between loneliness and morbidity more generally.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tics.2009.06.005

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous reviews report equivocal findings regarding the association between aspects of social connections and cognitive function from both cross-sectional and longitudinal studies.

    “Each of these reviews reports equivocal findings regarding the association between aspects of social connections and cognitive function from both cross-sectional and longitudinal studies.”

    From Social Isolation and Cognitive Function in Later Life: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2019) · cites this paper as [52]

    The Cognitive Capacities section reports both baseline and longitudinal associations between loneliness and cognition, while the Conclusion notes uncertainty about whether loneliness causes cognitive decline. But the review does not characterize the findings overall as equivocal: it emphasizes consistent associations for loneliness, in contrast to a lack of evidence for effects of social network size or activity. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Lonely individuals struggle to use their social skills and approach social situations in a more defensive manner.

    “Lonely individuals also struggle to use their social skills (Knowles et al., 2015) and approach social situations in a more defensive manner (Cacioppo et al., 2006;Cacioppo & Hawkley, 2009), such that even if they are motivated to seek connections with others, these attempts to reconnect may not be successful.”
  • In longitudinal studies, perceived isolation effects resemble experimental isolation effects in nonhuman social species: higher tonic sympathetic tone and HPA activation, lower inflammatory control and immunity, altered glucocorticoid-regulating gene expression, and glucocorticoid resistance.

    “the effects of perceived isolation in these longitudinal studies share much in common with the effects of experimental manipulations of isolation in nonhuman social species: increased tonic sympathetic tonus and HPA activation and decreased inflammatory control and immunity; expression of genes regulating glucocorticoid responses; and glucocorticoid resistance.”

    From Social isolation (2011) · cites this paper as [22]

  • Perceived social isolation is a stronger determinant of harmful outcomes than objective social isolation variation in population-based studies.

    “perceived social isolation is a more important determinant of deleterious outcomes than is the variation in objective social isolation that is seen in population based studies”

    From Social isolation (2011) · cites this paper as [22]

  • After 25 generations of selective breeding for high versus low separation USVs, high-line rats showed more infant distress, longer latency to play, and more depression-like, anxiety-like, social interaction latency, startle, and learning deficits as adults; low-line rats were exploratory, active, and aggressive.

    “After 25 generations of selective breeding, differences in behavior between the two lines of rats were reminiscent of some of the differences observed in humans who are high or low in perceived isolation:22 the high, relative to low, USV line showed more distress to isolation as an infant; greater latency to play as an adolescent; and greater depression-like behaviors, greater anxiety-like Behavi”

    From Social isolation (2011) · cites this paper as [22]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. [53]Hatfield E 1994 Emotional Contagion Cambridge University Press
  2. [57]Boomsma D 2005 Genetic and Environmental Contributions to Loneliness in Adults: The Netherlands Twin Register Study Behav Genet 35 745 752 16273322
  3. [61]Hawkey LC 2006 Loneliness is a unique predictor of age-related differences in systolic blood pressure Psychol Aging 21 152 164 16594800
  4. [62]Hawkley LC 2009 Loneliness predicts reduced physical activity: Cross-sectional & longitudinal analyses Health Psychol 28 354 363 19450042 PMC2791498
  5. [66]Adam EK 2006 Day-to-day dynamics of experience-cortisol associations in a population-based sample of older adults Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103 17058 17063 17075058 PMC1636578
  6. [78]Cacioppo JT 2009 In the Eye of the Beholder: Individual Differences in Perceived Social Isolation Predict Regional Brain Activation to Social Stimuli J Cogn Neurosci 21 1 10 18476760 PMC2810252

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cacioppo, J. T., & Hawkley, L. C.
Affiliations
University of Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Cacioppo, John T.
Venue
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-10
Volume
13
Issue
10
Pages
447-454
ISSN
1364-6613 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2131334268
Cited by
2,144
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 284 · 2025: 270 · 2024: 202 · 2023: 185 · 2022: 196 · 2021: 202 · 2020: 175 · 2019: 116 · 2018: 95 · 2017: 95 · 2016: 71 · 2015: 76 · 2014: 57 · 2013: 39 · 2012: 37
FWCI
3.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Trends in Cognitive Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (Z99 RG999999)
  • National Institute on Aging (P01AG18911, P01AG018911, R01AG034052)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
perceived social isolation, loneliness, cognitive decline, executive function, depressive cognitions, confirmation bias, anthropomorphism, social contagion, social cohesion, attention, morbidity
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Cognition, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Loneliness, Neural Pathways, Neuropsychological Tests, Problem Solving, Social Isolation, Social Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review