Cited by 158Personality Traits and PsychologyEgo Development and Educational PracticesPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

Development of B ig F ive Domains and Facets in Adulthood: Mean‐Level Age Trends and Broadly Versus Narrowly Acting Mechanisms

Soto, Christopher J., John, Oliver P.·2012·Journal of Personality

Abstract

Data from a cross‐sectional sample (N = 601 men and women) and a longitudinal sample (N = 125 women) were used to test hypotheses about the development of B ig F ive domains and facets from early adulthood through middle age. Analyses of mean‐level age trends indicated that overall A greeableness and C onscientiousness increased with age and that several facets showed distinctive trends that replicated across the samples. Cross‐sectional analyses of trait intercorrelations and covariances indicated that interrelations between the B ig F ive domains, and between their more specific facets, were quite similar at older versus younger ages. Finally, longitudinal analyses of individual‐level changes indicated that (a) different people's personalities changed in markedly different ways; (b) these changes were predominantly independent, rather than correlated, across B ig F ive domains; and (c) the pattern of change correlations between B ig F ive facets could be explained by the facets’ interrelations at the first assessment time. Taken together, these results suggest that a complete understanding of personality development requires consideration of facet‐level traits and that adult personality development is predominantly influenced by narrowly acting mechanisms that each affect a single B ig F ive domain, or a small cluster of related facets, rather than by broadly acting mechanisms that simultaneously affect previously independent traits.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00752.x

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • According to Soto and John (2012), the degree of correlated change indicates the extent to which personality development is influenced by broadly acting mechanisms that simultaneously affect multiple traits vs. narrowly acting mechanisms that affect single trait domains in isolation.

    “According to Soto and John (2012), the degree of correlated change indicates the extent to which personality development is influenced by broadly acting mechanisms that simultaneously affect multiple traits vs. narrowly acting mechanisms that affect single trait domains in isolation.”

    From Life Events and Personality Trait Change. (2018) · cites this paper as Soto and John (2012)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Soto, C. J., & John, O. P.
Affiliations
  • Colby College (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
Corresponding author
Soto, Christopher J.
Venue
Journal of Personality
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-06-29
Volume
80
Issue
4
Pages
881-914
ISSN
  • 0022-3506 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-6494
OpenAlex
W1793952300
Cited by
158
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
6.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Ego Development and Educational Practices
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
Big Five personality traits, personality facets, personality development, adult development, age trends, agreeableness, conscientiousness, middle age (human life stage)
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Personality, Personality Development, Personality Inventory, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review