The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Chloroplast genome sequences from total DNA for plant identification
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Chloroplast DNA sequence data are a versatile tool for plant identification or barcoding and establishing genetic relationships among plant species. Different chloroplast loci have been utilized for use at close and distant evolutionary distances in plants, and no single locus has been identified that can distinguish between all plant species. Advances in DNA sequencing technology are providing new cost‐effective options for genome comparisons on a much larger scale. Universal PCR amplification of chloroplast sequences or isolation of pure chloroplast fractions, however, are non‐trivial. We now propose the analysis of chloroplast genome sequences from massively parallel sequencing (MPS) of total DNA as a simple and cost‐effective option for plant barcoding, and analysis of plant relationships to guide gene discovery for biotechnology. We present chloroplast genome sequences of five grass species derived from MPS of total DNA. These data accurately established the phylogenetic relationships between the species, correcting an apparent error in the published rice sequence. The chloroplast genome may be the elusive single‐locus DNA barcode for plants.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mauve: Multiple alignment of conserved genomic sequence with rearrangements
Darling, A. C. E., Mau, B., Blattner, F. R., & Perna, N. T. (2004) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.2289704 · Cited by 4,949
Cited by
Towards next-generation biodiversity assessment using DNA metabarcoding
TABERLET, P., COISSAC, E., POMPANON, F., BROCHMANN, C., & WILLERSLEV, E. (2012) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2012.05470.x · Cited by 1,907
Choosing and Using a Plant DNA Barcode
Hollingsworth, P. M., Graham, S. W., & Little, D. P. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0019254 · Cited by 1,305
Navigating the tip of the genomic iceberg: Next‐generation sequencing for plant systematics
Straub, S. C. K., Parks, M., Weitemier, K., Fishbein, M., Cronn, R. C., & Liston, A. (2012) · American Journal of Botany · doi:10.3732/ajb.1100335 · Cited by 696
Genomics of crop wild relatives: expanding the gene pool for crop improvement
Brozynska, M., Furtado, A., & Henry, R. J. (2016) · Plant Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1111/pbi.12454 · Cited by 426
Self-citationScaling up: A guide to high‐throughput genomic approaches for biodiversity analysis
Porter, T. M., & Hajibabaei, M. (2018) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.14478 · Cited by 305
Metadata
- Authors
- Nock, C. J., Waters, D. L. E., Edwards, M. A., Bowen, S. G., Rice, N., Cordeiro, G. M., & Henry, R. J.
- Venue
- Plant Biotechnology Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-08-27
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 328-333
- ISSN
- 1467-7644 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-7652
- OpenAlex
- W2114281985
- Cited by
- 405
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 18.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Chloroplast genome sequences from total DNA for plant identification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-7652.2010.00558.x
- The paper
- Nock, C. J., Waters, D. L. E., Edwards, M. A., Bowen, S. G., Rice, N., Cordeiro, G. M., & Henry, R. J. (2011). Chloroplast genome sequences from total DNA for plant identification. Plant Biotechnology Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7652.2010.00558.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.