The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Monitoring Elite Capture in Community‐Driven Development
Abstract
Recently, a lot of attention has been paid to improving ways of assessing the effectiveness of development interventions. This is to be welcomed, especially with regard to community‐based or participatory aid projects, since considerable resources are currently being earmarked for these by almost all types of donor agencies, including large international organizations. Such projects are vulnerable to elite capture at local level, and this problem must be mitigated if most of the aid funds thus disbursed are to reach the intended beneficiaries. This article discusses several methods available to achieve that objective. In particular, it argues that the sequential and conditional release of aid funds may not be sufficient to keep elite capture well under control, making it necessary to resort to co‐ordination mechanisms among aid agencies, such as multilateral reputation mechanisms. Even these are not going to be effective enough, however. In the end, an active role will have to be played by the ultimate purveyors of aid money, whether the taxpayers or the contributors in fund‐raising campaigns.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Toward a Comparative Institutional Analysis
Aoki, M. (2001) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/6867.001.0001 · Cited by 1,480
Cited by
Analyzing decentralized resource regimes from a polycentric perspective
Andersson, K. P., & Ostrom, E. (2008) · Policy Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11077-007-9055-6 · Cited by 775
Sovacool, B. K. (2021) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2021.101916 · Cited by 614
Impact of farmer field schools on agricultural productivity and poverty in East Africa
Davis, K., Nkonya, E., Kato, E., Mekonnen, D. A., Odendo, M., Miiro, R., & Nkuba, J. (2012) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.05.019 · Cited by 561
RESILIENCE THINKING: LESSONS FOR PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
DUIT, A. (2016) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/padm.12182 · Cited by 285
Londres, M., Larson, A. M., & Barletti, J. P. S. (2021) · International Forestry Review · doi:10.1505/146554821833466112 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Platteau, J.
- Venue
- Development and Change
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-04
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 223-246
- ISSN
- 0012-155X (ISSN-L)
- 1467-7660
- OpenAlex
- W2093281620
- Cited by
- 549
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 45.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.