‘Social Exclusion’ Discourse and Chronic Poverty: A South African Case Study
Abstract
This article questions the export of ‘social exclusion’ discourse to the field of development and poverty studies. It considers the findings of ongoing research into chronic poverty in the Western Cape district of Ceres, one of the centres of the South African deciduous fruit export industry. It explores the links between the livelihood options of poor people and processes of global integration, agro‐food restructuring and the modernization of paternalist farming styles. In this context the concept of ‘social exclusion’ is of only limited utility, and has significant disadvantages. Although it has the potential to focus attention on the disabling effects of poverty, its most common usage often fails to capture how poverty can flow not only from exclusion but also from processes of integration into broader economic and social networks. The author argues that these are better captured by the notion of ‘adverse incorporation’, and calls for a more cautious approach to the modernizing myths and moralizing narratives that shape policy debates.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Across southern Africa and beyond, agricultural labour regimes are changing from more formal, regulated systems centred on wage work to more informal systems where paid employment is only one element of a range of livelihood activities.
“Across southern Africa, and beyond, agricultural labour regimes are changing from more formal, regulated systems centred on wage work, with clear conditions of employment, to more informal systems, where 'work', as paid employment, is only one element of a range of livelihood activities, part of a complex bricolage of opportunities put together often under very difficult conditions (Du Toit, 2004)”
From Labour after Land Reform: The Precarious Livelihoods of Former Farmworkers in Zimbabwe (2019) · cites this paper as Du Toit, 2004
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Alford, M., & Phillips, N. (2018) · Review of International Political Economy · doi:10.1080/09692290.2017.1423367 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Labour after Land Reform: The Precarious Livelihoods of Former Farmworkers in Zimbabwe
Scoones, I., Mavedzenge, B., Murimbarimba, F., & Sukume, C. (2019) · Development and Change · doi:10.1111/dech.12449 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
“…systems centred on wage work, with clear conditions of employment, to more informal systems, where ‘work’, as paid employment, is only one element of a range of livelihood activities, part of a complex bricolage of opportunities put together often under very difficult conditions (Du Toit, 2004).”
BackgroundCreutzig, F., Corbera, E., Bolwig, S., & Hunsberger, C. (2013) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/035047 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
- Authors
- Du Toit, A.
- Venue
- Development and Change
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-11
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 987-1010
- ISSN
- 0012-155X (ISSN-L)
- 1467-7660
- OpenAlex
- W2162111178
- Cited by
- 219
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 27.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Development and Change (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Income, Poverty, and Inequality
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › World Systems and Global Transformations
- Keywords
- social exclusion, chronic poverty, poverty discourse, global integration, livelihoods, Ceres, Western Cape, poverty policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review