Cited by 55Bioenergy crop production and managementAgriculture, Land Use, Rural DevelopmentBioeconomy and Sustainability Development

Integrating place-specific livelihood and equity outcomes into global assessments of bioenergy deployment

Open access
Creutzig, Felix, Corbera, Esteve, Bolwig, Simon, Hunsberger, Carol·2013·Environmental Research Letters

Abstract

Integrated assessment models suggest that the large-scale deployment of bioenergy could contribute to ambitious climate change mitigation efforts. However, such a shift would intensify the global competition for land, with possible consequences for 1.5 billion smallholder livelihoods that these models do not consider. Maintaining and enhancing robust livelihoods upon bioenergy deployment is an equally important sustainability goal that warrants greater attention. The social implications of biofuel production are complex, varied and place-specific, difficult to model, operationalize and quantify. However, a rapidly developing body of social science literature is advancing the understanding of these interactions. In this letter we link human geography research on the interaction between biofuel crops and livelihoods in developing countries to integrated assessments on biofuels. We review case-study research focused on first-generation biofuel crops to demonstrate that food, income, land and other assets such as health are key livelihood dimensions that can be impacted by such crops and we highlight how place-specific and global dynamics influence both aggregate and distributional outcomes across these livelihood dimensions. We argue that place-specific production models and land tenure regimes mediate livelihood outcomes, which are also in turn affected by global and regional markets and their resulting equilibrium dynamics. The place-specific perspective suggests that distributional consequences are a crucial complement to aggregate outcomes; this has not been given enough weight in comprehensive assessments to date. By narrowing the gap between place-specific case studies and global models, our discussion offers a route towards integrating livelihood and equity considerations into scenarios of future bioenergy deployment, thus contributing to a key challenge in sustainability sciences.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/035047

Cites

85 of 85 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Large-scale bioenergy production could alter the structure of global agricultural markets in a way that is potentially unfavorable to small-scale food producers.

    “Large-scale bioenergy producƟon could alter the structure of global agricultural markets in a way that is, potenƟally, unfavorable to small-scale food producers.”

    From Connecting the sustainable development goals by their energy inter-linkages (2018) · cites this paper as Creutzig et al. (2013)

  • Large-scale bioenergy production could lead to the creation of agricultural jobs, as well as higher farm wages and more diversified income streams for farmers.

    “Large-scale bioenergy producƟon could lead to the creaƟon of agricultural jobs, as well higher farm wages and more diversified income streams for farmers.”

    From Connecting the sustainable development goals by their energy inter-linkages (2018) · cites this paper as Creutzig et al. (2013)

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 87 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Creutzig, F., Corbera, E., Bolwig, S., & Hunsberger, C.
Affiliations
  • Princeton University (US)
  • Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
  • Technical University of Denmark (DK)
Corresponding author
Creutzig, Felix
Venue
Environmental Research Letters
Published
2013-09-01
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
035047
ISSN
1748-9326 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2052173379
Cited by
55
References
87
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1
FWCI
12.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environmental Research Letters (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Publication Database PIK (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK)) (submittedVersion)
  • Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development
Keywords
biofuels, smallholder livelihoods, land use competition, land tenure, distributional equity, integrated assessment models, food security, income, sustainability assessment, climate change mitigation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review