The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Political power beyond the State: problematics of government
Abstract
This paper sets out an approach to the analysis of political power in terms of problematics of government. It argues against an overvaluation of the ‘problem of the State’ in political debate and social theory. A number of conceptual tools are suggested for the analysis of the many and varied alliances between political and other authorities that seek to govern economic activity, social life and individual conduct. Modern political rationalities and governmental technologies are shown to be intrinsically linked to developments in knowledge and to the powers of expertise. The characteristics of liberal problematics of government are investigated, and it is argued that they are dependent upon technologies for ‘governing at a distance’, seeking to create locales, entities and persons able to operate a regulated autonomy. The analysis is exemplified through an investigation of welfarism as a mode of ‘social’ government. The paper concludes with a brief consideration of neo‐liberalism which demonstrates that the analytical language structured by the philosophical opposition of state and civil society is unable to comprehend contemporary transformations in modes of exercise of political power.1
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Miller, P., & Rose, N. (1990) · Economy and Society · doi:10.1080/03085149000000001 · Cited by 2,877
Self-citationAccounting and the construction of the governable person
Miller, P., & O'Leary, T. (1987) · Accounting, Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/0361-3682(87)90039-0 · Cited by 1,505
Self-citationThe archeology of accounting systems
Hopwood, A. G. (1987) · Accounting, Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/0361-3682(87)90038-9 · Cited by 1,265
Cited by
The death of the social? Re-figuring the territory of government
Rose, N. (1996) · Economy and Society · doi:10.1080/03085149600000018 · Cited by 1,646
Self-citationExplaining Michigan: Developing an Ex Post Theory of a Quality Improvement Program
DIXON-WOODS, M., BOSK, C. L., AVELING, E. L., GOESCHEL, C. A., & PRONOVOST, P. J. (2011) · Milbank Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0009.2011.00625.x · Cited by 603
Miller, P., & Napier, C. (1993) · Accounting, Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/0361-3682(93)90047-a · Cited by 506
Self-citationNegotiating Statehood: Dynamics of Power and Domination in Africa
Hagmann, T., & Péclard, D. (2010) · Development and Change · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7660.2010.01656.x · Cited by 499
GOVERNING CITIZENS THROUGH SELF-HELP LITERATURE
Rimke, H. M. (2000) · Cultural Studies · doi:10.1080/095023800334986 · Cited by 429
Metadata
- Authors
- Rose, N., & Miller, P.
- Venue
- The British Journal of Sociology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-01
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- s1
- Pages
- 271-303
- ISSN
- 0007-1315 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-4446
- OpenAlex
- W2020143031
- Cited by
- 3,194
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 661.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Political power beyond the State: problematics of government. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2009.01247.x
- The paper
- Rose, N., & Miller, P. (2010). Political power beyond the State: problematics of government. The British Journal of Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2009.01247.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.