Labour in global value chains: Work conditions in football manufacturing in China, India and Pakistan
Open accessAbstract
A critical challenge facing developing country producers is to meet international labour standards and codes of conduct in order to engage in global value chains. Evidence of gains for workers from compliance with such standards and codes remains limited and patchy. This article focuses on the global football industry, a sector dominated by leading global brands that manage dispersed global value chains. It assesses the working conditions for football stitchers engaged in different forms of work organization, factories, stitching centres and home‐based settings in Pakistan, India and China. It draws on detailed qualitative primary field research with football‐stitching workers and producers in these three countries. The article explains how and why work conditions of football stitchers differ across these locations through an analytical framework that interweaves both global and local production contexts that influence work conditions. In doing so, it argues that current debates on the role of labour in global value chains have to go beyond a narrow focus on labour standards and corporate social responsibility compliance and engage with economic, technological and social upgrading as factors that could generate sustained improvements in real wages and workers’ conditions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
This development is reflected in the adaptation of global codes of conduct, certifications, and compliance regulations, especially by larger organizations with structured global value chains.
“This development is reflected in the adaptation of global codes of conduct, certifications, and compliance regulations, especially by larger organizations with structured global value chains (Lund-Thomsen, Nadvi, Chan, Khara, & Xue, 2012).”
From Common Good HRM: A paradigm shift in Sustainable HRM? (2020) · cites this paper as Lund-Thomsen, Nadvi, Chan, Khara, & Xue, 2012
Cites
Global production networks and the analysis of economic development
Henderson, J., Dicken, P., Hess, M., Coe, N., & Yeung, H. W.-C. (2002) · Review of International Political Economy · doi:10.1080/09692290210150842 · Cited by 2,216 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Common Good HRM: A paradigm shift in Sustainable HRM?
Aust, I., Matthews, B., & Muller-Camen, M. (2020) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2019.100705 · Cited by 531 · see citing works
Pipkin, S., & Fuentes, A. (2017) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.05.009 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
Corporate social responsibility and labour agency: the case of Nike in Pakistan
Lund-Thomsen, P., & Coe, N. M. (2015) · Journal of Economic Geography · doi:10.1093/jeg/lbt041 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Lund‐Thomsen, P., Nadvi, K., Chan, A., Khara, N., & Xue, H.
- Affiliations
- Copenhagen Business School (DK)
- University of Manchester (GB)
- University of Technology Sydney (AU)
- East China Normal University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Lund‐Thomsen, Peter
- Nadvi, Khalid
- Chan, Anita
- Khara, Navjote
- Xue, Hong
- Venue
- Development and Change
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-09-28
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1211-1237
- ISSN
- 0012-155X (ISSN-L)
- 1467-7660
- OpenAlex
- W2115158349
- Cited by
- 98
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8
- FWCI
- 23.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- Locations
- Development and Change (publishedVersion)
- CBS Research Portal (Copenhagen Business School) (publishedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
- UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
- Social Sciences › Development › Software Engineering and Design Patterns
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Labor and Employment Law
- Keywords
- global value chains, working conditions, labor standards, codes of conduct, corporate social responsibility, working from home, work organization, real wages, social upgrading, technological upgrading, China, India, Pakistan
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review