Cited by 97Language Development and DisordersReading and Literacy DevelopmentNeurobiology of Language and Bilingualism

Linking working memory and long‐term memory: a computational model of the learning of new words

Open access
Jones, Gary, Gobet, Fernand, Pine, Julian M.·2007·Developmental Science

Abstract

The nonword repetition (NWR) test has been shown to be a good predictor of children's vocabulary size. NWR performance has been explained using phonological working memory, which is seen as a critical component in the learning of new words. However, no detailed specification of the link between phonological working memory and long-term memory (LTM) has been proposed. In this paper, we present a computational model of children's vocabulary acquisition (EPAM-VOC) that specifies how phonological working memory and LTM interact. The model learns phoneme sequences, which are stored in LTM and mediate how much information can be held in working memory. The model's behaviour is compared with that of children in a new study of NWR, conducted in order to ensure the same nonword stimuli and methodology across ages. EPAM-VOC shows a pattern of results similar to that of children: performance is better for shorter nonwords and for wordlike nonwords, and performance improves with age. EPAM-VOC also simulates the superior performance for single consonant nonwords over clustered consonant nonwords found in previous NWR studies. EPAM-VOC provides a simple and elegant computational account of some of the key processes involved in the learning of new words: it specifies how phonological working memory and LTM interact; makes testable predictions; and suggests that developmental changes in NWR performance may reflect differences in the amount of information that has been encoded in LTM rather than developmental changes in working memory capacity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00638.x

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Working memory capacity grows from infancy through childhood into adolescence, driven by maturation and knowledge gains.

    “WM capacitythat is, the maximum amount of information that WM can store and manipulate -steadily increases throughout infancy and childhood up to adolescence (Cowan, 2016;Gathercole, Pickering, Ambridge, & Wearing, 2004), both due to maturation and increase in knowledge (Cowan, 2016;Jones, Gobet, & Pine, 2007).”

    From Working memory training in typically developing children: A multilevel meta-analysis (2020) · cites this paper as Jones et al., 2007

    In “Interaction of phonological working memory with LTM knowledge,” the paper explains that accumulated knowledge can increase how much information children hold in working memory. It does not establish a steady increase from infancy through adolescence or show that maturation drives it; instead, it says developmental changes in capacity may not be necessary to explain the performance changes studied. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Dunn, L. M., Dunn, L. M., Whetton, C., & Burley, J. (1997). The British Picture Vocabulary Scale (2 nd ed.). Windsor, UK:NFER-Nelson.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jones, G., Gobet, F., & Pine, J. M.
Affiliations
  • Nottingham Trent University (GB)
  • Brunel University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Jones, Gary
Venue
Developmental Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-10-25
Volume
10
Issue
6
Pages
853-873
ISSN
  • 1363-755X (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-7687
OpenAlex
W2090414337
Cited by
97
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 9
FWCI
11.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Developmental Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Nottingham Trent University's Institutional Repository (Nottingham Trent Repository) (acceptedVersion)
  • Brunel University Research Archive (BURA) (Brunel University London) (submittedVersion)
  • Nottingham Trent University's Institutional Repository (Nottingham Trent Repository) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Keywords
non-word repetition, phonological working memory, long-term memory, vocabulary acquisition, word learning, computational model, phoneme sequences, working memory capacity
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Child, Preschool, Humans, Language Development, Learning, Memory, Memory, Short-Term, Models, Biological, Mental Recall, Vocabulary

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review