Cited by 1,018Language Development and DisordersReading and Literacy DevelopmentCognitive Abilities and Testing

Evaluation of the role of phonological STM in the development of vocabulary in children: A longitudinal study

Gathercole, Susan E, Baddeley, Alan D·1989·Journal of Memory and Language

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0749-596x(89)90044-2

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gathercole, S. E., & Baddeley, A. D.
Corresponding author
Gathercole, Susan E
Venue
Journal of Memory and Language
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1989-04
Volume
28
Issue
2
Pages
200-213
ISSN
0749-596X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2130302876
Cited by
1,018
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 45 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 38 · 2013: 37 · 2012: 42
FWCI
17.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Memory and Language (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
phonological memory, vocabulary acquisition, working memory, preschool children, non-word repetition, longitudinal development, nonverbal intelligence, reading development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review