Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 470

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Body mass index, waist circumference and waist–hip ratio: which is the better discriminator of cardiovascular disease mortality risk? Evidence from an individual‐participant meta‐analysis of 82 864 participants from nine cohort studies

Open access
Czernichow, S., Kengne, A.‐P., Stamatakis, E., Hamer, M., Batty, G. D.·2011·Obesity Reviews

Abstract

Summary: Few studies have examined both the relative magnitude of association and the discriminative capability of multiple indicators of obesity with cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality risk. We conducted an individual‐participant meta‐analysis of nine cohort studies of men and women drawn from the British general population resulting in sample of 82 864 individuals. Body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC) and waist‐to‐hip ratio (WHR) were measured directly. There were 6641 deaths (1998 CVD) during a mean of 8.1 years of follow‐up. After adjustment, a one SD higher in WHR and WC was related to a higher risk of CVD mortality (hazard ratio [95% CI]): 1.15 (1.05–1.25) and 1.15 (1.04–1.27), respectively. The risk of CVD mortality also increased linearly across quintiles of both these abdominal obesity markers with a 66% increased risk in the highest quintile of WHR. In age‐ and sex‐adjusted models only, BMI was related to CVD mortality but not in any other analyses. No major differences were revealed in the discrimination capabilities of models with BMI, WC or WHR for cardiovascular or total mortality outcomes. In conclusion, measures of abdominal adiposity, but not BMI, were related to an increased risk of CVD mortality. No difference was observed in discrimination capacities between adiposity markers.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-789x.2011.00879.x

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67483-1 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1136/bmj.288.6428.1401 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/0895-4356(90)90232-E · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.annepidem.2004.05.012 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60318-4 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1093/ajcn/75.6.1107 · DOI
  7. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm026 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1097/HJR.0b013e328331dfc0 · DOI
  9. 10.3945/ajcn.2009.28757 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.739714 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1002/sim.2929 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.7326/0003-4819-150-11-200906020-00007 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Health Survey for England 1998. Cardiovascular Disease. Joint Health Surveys Unit, 1999, Volume 2: Methodology and Documentation
  14. 10.1002/sim.4780100703 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.109.133041 · DOI
  16. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.192574 · DOI
  17. 10.1002/j.1550-8528.1999.tb00417.x · DOI

Cited by

See all 470

Metadata

Authors
Czernichow, S., Kengne, A. ‐., Stamatakis, E., Hamer, M., & Batty, G. D.
Venue
Obesity Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-04-27
Volume
12
Issue
9
Pages
680-687
ISSN
  • 1467-7881 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-789X
OpenAlex
W2102524227
Cited by
470
References
4
FWCI
20.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Body mass index, waist circumference and waist–hip ratio: which is the better discriminator of cardiovascular disease mortality risk? Evidence from an individual‐participant meta‐analysis of 82 864 participants from nine cohort studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-789x.2011.00879.x
The paper
Czernichow, S., Kengne, A. ‐., Stamatakis, E., Hamer, M., & Batty, G. D. (2011). Body mass index, waist circumference and waist–hip ratio: which is the better discriminator of cardiovascular disease mortality risk? Evidence from an individual‐participant meta‐analysis of 82 864 participants from nine cohort studies. Obesity Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-789x.2011.00879.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.