Cited by 1,073Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsCardiovascular Disease and AdiposityCardiovascular Health and Risk Factors

Waist circumference and waist-to-hip ratio as predictors of cardiovascular events: meta-regression analysis of prospective studies

Open access
de Koning, L., Merchant, A. T., Pogue, J., Anand, S. S.·2007·European Heart Journal

Abstract

AIMS: The objectives of this study were to determine the association of waist circumference (WC) and waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) with the risk of incident cardiovascular disease (CVD) events and to determine whether the strength of association of WC and WHR with CVD risk is different. METHODS AND RESULTS: This meta-regression analysis used a search strategy of keywords and MeSH terms to identify prospective cohort studies and randomized clinical trials of CVD risk and abdominal obesity from the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Fifteen articles (n = 258 114 participants, 4355 CVD events) reporting CVD risk by categorical and continuous measures of WC and WHR were included. For a 1 cm increase in WC, the relative risk (RR) of a CVD event increased by 2% (95% CI: 1-3%) overall after adjusting for age, cohort year, or treatment. For a 0.01 U increase in WHR, the RR increased by 5% (95% CI: 4-7%). These results were consistent in men and women. Overall risk estimates comparing the extreme quantiles of each measure suggested that WHR was more strongly associated with CVD than that for WC (WHR: RR = 1.95, 95% CI: 1.55-2.44; WC: RR = 1.63, 95% CI: 1.31-2.04), although this difference was not significant. The strength of association for each measure was similar in men and women. CONCLUSION: WHR and WC are significantly associated with the risk of incident CVD events. These simple measures of abdominal obesity should be incorporated into CVD risk assessments.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm026

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de Koning, L., Merchant, A. T., Pogue, J., & Anand, S. S.
Affiliations
  • McMaster University (CA)
  • Hamilton General Hospital (CA)
Venue
European Heart Journal
Published
2007-03-23
Volume
28
Issue
7
Pages
850-856
ISSN
  • 0195-668X (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-9645
OpenAlex
W2134326473
Cited by
1,073
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 61 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 71 · 2018: 60 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 66 · 2015: 56 · 2014: 74 · 2013: 73 · 2012: 58
FWCI
31.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • European Heart Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Keywords
waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, cardiovascular risk, abdominal obesity, cardiovascular events, cardiovascular risk assessment, anthropometric measures
MeSH terms
Cardiovascular Diseases, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Risk Assessment, Waist-Hip Ratio

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review