Cited by 2,155Obesity, Physical Activity, DietCancer Risks and FactorsBody Composition Measurement Techniques

General and abdominal adiposity and risk of death in Europe

Open access
Pischon, T., Boeing, H., Hoffmann, K., Bergmann, M., Schulze, M.B., Overvad, K., van der Schouw, Y.T., Spencer, E. +40 more·2008·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have relied predominantly on the body-mass index (BMI, the weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters) to assess the association of adiposity with the risk of death, but few have examined whether the distribution of body fat contributes to the prediction of death. METHODS: We examined the association of BMI, waist circumference, and waist-to-hip ratio with the risk of death among 359,387 participants from nine countries in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC). We used a Cox regression analysis, with age as the time variable, and stratified the models according to study center and age at recruitment, with further adjustment for educational level, smoking status, alcohol consumption, physical activity, and height. RESULTS: During a mean follow-up of 9.7 years, 14,723 participants died. The lowest risks of death related to BMI were observed at a BMI of 25.3 for men and 24.3 for women. After adjustment for BMI, waist circumference and waist-to-hip ratio were strongly associated with the risk of death. Relative risks among men and women in the highest quintile of waist circumference were 2.05 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.80 to 2.33) and 1.78 (95% CI, 1.56 to 2.04), respectively, and in the highest quintile of waist-to-hip ratio, the relative risks were 1.68 (95% CI, 1.53 to 1.84) and 1.51 (95% CI, 1.37 to 1.66), respectively. BMI remained significantly associated with the risk of death in models that included waist circumference or waist-to-hip ratio (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that both general adiposity and abdominal adiposity are associated with the risk of death and support the use of waist circumference or waist-to-hip ratio in addition to BMI in assessing the risk of death.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa0801891

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In EPIC, BMI, waist circumference, and waist:hip ratio were all independently associated with all-cause mortality; authors recommended waist circumference or waist:hip ratio in addition to BMI; no direct comparisons of magnitudes were made.

    “In the multicentre European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) cohort study, BMI, waist circumference, and waist:hip ratio were all independently associated with allcause mortality; the authors recommended the use of waist circumference or waist:hip ratio in addition to BMI for assessing risk of death; however, no direct comparisons of the magnitudes of associations between”
  • In Europe, general obesity and abdominal adiposity are both associated with increased risk of death.

    “In Europe, a recent study of nearly 360 000 participants from nine European countries showed that general obesity and abdominal adiposity are both associated with increased risk of death.372”
  • A study of nearly 360,000 participants from nine European countries found that general obesity and abdominal adiposity are associated with mortality risk, supporting the use of waist circumference or waist-to-hip ratio in addition to BMI for mortality risk assessment.

    “A recent study of nearly 360,000 participants from 9 European countries showed that both general obesity and abdominal adiposity are associated with risk of death and support the importance of WC or WHR in addition to BMI for assessing mortality risk (4).”

    From Obesity and Cardiovascular Disease (2009) · cites this paper as [4]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Haslam DW, James WP. Obesity. Lan1. cet 2005;366:1197-209.
  2. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied lo28. gistic regression. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley, 2000.
  3. Obesity: preventing and managing the 34. global epidemic: report of a WHO consultation. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 2000;894:1-253.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pischon, T., Boeing, H., Hoffmann, K., Bergmann, M., Schulze, M. B., Overvad, K., van der Schouw, Y. T., Spencer, E., Moons, K. G. M., Tjønneland, A., Halkjaer, J., Jensen, M. K., Stegger, J., Clavel-Chapelon, F., Boutron-Ruault, M.-C., Chajes, V., Linseisen, J., Kaaks, R., Trichopoulou, A., Trichopoulos, D., Bamia, C., Sieri, S., Palli, D., Tumino, R., Vineis, P., Panico, S., Peeters, P. H. M., May, A. M., Bueno-de-Mesquita, H. B., van Duijnhoven, F. J. B., Hallmans, G., Weinehall, L., Manjer, J., Hedblad, B., Lund, E., Agudo, A., Arriola, L., Barricarte, A., Navarro, C., Martinez, C., Quirós, J. R., Key, T., Bingham, S., Khaw, K. T., Boffetta, P., Jenab, M., Ferrari, P., & Riboli, E.
Affiliations
  • German Institute of Human Nutrition (DE)
  • Instituto de Salud Pública de Navarra (ES)
  • Gobierno del Principado de Asturias (ES)
  • Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (ES)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2008-11-13
Volume
359
Issue
20
Pages
2105-2120
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2106650290
Cited by
2,155
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 47 · 2025: 72 · 2024: 102 · 2023: 106 · 2022: 109 · 2021: 109 · 2020: 97 · 2019: 100 · 2018: 105 · 2017: 117 · 2016: 134 · 2015: 130 · 2014: 143 · 2013: 149 · 2012: 153
FWCI
156.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion)
  • Rivm (National Institute for Public Health and the Environment) (submittedVersion)
  • OPUS (Augsburg University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust
  • Cancer Research UK
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • British Heart Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Risks and Factors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
Keywords
abdominal fat, general adiposity, body mass index, waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, mortality risk, body fat distribution, EPIC cohort, cardiovascular risk assessment
MeSH terms
Abdomen, Adult, Aged, Alcohol Drinking, Body Height, Europe, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Mortality, Obesity, Risk, Smoking, Exercise, Body Mass Index, Proportional Hazards Models, Waist-Hip Ratio, Adiposity, Waist Circumference

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review