Cited by 277Agricultural Science and FertilizationAgricultural Innovations and PracticesAgricultural economics and policies

State‐conditional Fertilizer Yield Response on Western Kenyan Farms

Open access
Marenya, Paswel P., Barrett, Christopher B.·2009·American Journal of Agricultural Economics

Abstract

Fertilizer interventions have attained prominence in rural poverty reduction programs in Africa. Using data from maize plots operated by small farmers in western Kenya, we find a von Liebig‐type relationship between soil organic matter (SOM) and maize yield response to nitrogen application. Low SOM commonly limits the yield response to mineral fertilizer application. Although fertilizer is, on average, profitable in our sample, on roughly one‐third of the plots degraded soils limit the marginal productivity of fertilizer such that it becomes unprofitable at prevailing prices. Moreover, because poorer farmers most commonly cultivate soils deficient in SOM, fertilizer interventions might be less pro‐poor than is widely assumed and may instead reinforce ex ante income inequality.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-8276.2009.01313.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marenya, P. P., & Barrett, C. B.
Affiliations
  • University of Nairobi (KE)
  • Cornell University (US)
Venue
American Journal of Agricultural Economics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-11
Volume
91
Issue
4
Pages
991-1006
ISSN
  • 0002-9092 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8276
OpenAlex
W2071506818
Cited by
277
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 14
FWCI
7.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Agricultural Economics (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Rockefeller Foundation
  • United States Agency for International Development
  • National Science Foundation (BCS‐0215890)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Agricultural Science and Fertilization
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Innovations and Practices
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Agricultural economics and policies
Keywords
soil organic matter, nitrogen fertilization, maize, smallholder farmers, soil degradation, fertilizer profitability, poverty reduction, income inequality, Western Kenya

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review