Cited by 23Economics of Agriculture and Food MarketsAgricultural Innovations and PracticesAgricultural economics and policies

Fertilizer demand and profitability amid global fuel-food-fertilizer crisis: Evidence from Ethiopia

Open access
Assefa, Thomas W., Berhane, Guush, Abate, Gashaw T., Abay, Kibrom A.·2025·Food Policy

Abstract

• We assess fertilizer demand and profitability amid fuel–food–fertilizer price crisis. • Smallholder farmers are more responsive to fertilizer prices than to output prices. • Share of farmers with profitable AVCRs declined following the fertilizer price surges. We assess fertilizer demand and profitability in Ethiopia in the face of the recent global fuel–food–fertilizer price crisis and other domestic shocks. We first examine farmers’ response to changes in both fertilizer and food prices by estimating price elasticity of demand. We then evaluate the profitability of fertilizer by computing average value–cost ratios (AVCRs) associated with fertilizer application before and after these crises. We use detailed longitudinal household survey data collected in three rounds, covering both pre-crisis (2016 and 2019) and post-crisis (2023) production periods, focusing on three main staple crops in Ethiopia (maize, teff, and wheat). Our analysis shows that fertilizer adoption, and yield levels were increasing until the recent crises, but these trends have been halted by these crises. We also find slightly larger fertilizer price elasticity of demand estimates than previous estimates, ranging between −0.40 and −1.12, which vary across crops. We find that farmers are more responsive to fertilizer prices than to output prices. Farmers’ response to increases in staple prices was statistically insignificant and hence not as strong as theoretically perceived. Households with smaller farm sizes are relatively more responsive to changes in fertilizer prices. Finally, we show important dynamics in the profitability of chemical fertilizer. While the AVCRs show profitable trends for most crops, the share of farmers with profitable AVCRs declined following the fertilizer price surges. Our findings offer important insights for policy focusing on mitigating the adverse effects of fertilizer price shocks.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.foodpol.2024.102785

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Assefa, T. W., Berhane, G., Abate, G. T., & Abay, K. A.
Affiliations
International Food Policy Research Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Abate, Gashaw T.
Venue
Food Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-05
Volume
133
Pages
102785
ISSN
0306-9192 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4405677491
Cited by
23
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 7
FWCI
8.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Food Policy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Consortium of International Agricultural Research Centers
  • United States Agency for International Development
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Innovations and Practices
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Agricultural economics and policies
Keywords
fertilizer demand, fertilizer profitability, smallholder farmers, maize, Eragrostis tef, wheat, farm size, price shocks, Ethiopia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review