The DOI matches its Crossref record; 67 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
To Make Live or Let Die? Rural Dispossession and the Protection of Surplus Populations
Abstract
Abstract: A biopolitics of the population, when it succeeds in securing life and wellbeing, is surely worth having. It has become urgent in rural Asia, where a new round of enclosures has dispossessed large numbers of people from access to land as a way to sustain their own lives, and neoliberal policies have curtailed programs that once helped to sustain rural populations. At the same time, new jobs in manufacturing have not emerged to absorb this population. They are thus “surplus” to the needs of capital, and not plausibly described as a labour reserve. Who, then, would act to keep these people alive, and why would they act? I examine this question by contrasting a conjuncture in India, where a make live program has been assembled under the rubric of the “right to food”, and Indonesia, where the massacre of the organized left in 1965 has left dispossessed populations radically exposed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality
Burchell, G., Gordon, C., & Miller, P. J. (1991) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 10,178
Capital: A Critique of Political Economy
(2020) · On Violence · doi:10.1515/9780822390169-009 · Cited by 9,870
Weapons of the weak: Everyday forms of peasant resistance
(1986) · World Development · doi:10.1016/0305-750x(86)90141-5 · Cited by 9,842
Church, J. A. (2001) · Journal of Government Information · doi:10.1016/s1352-0237(01)00307-0 · Cited by 9,153
Harvey, D. (2003) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780199264315.001.0001 · Cited by 7,037
Polanyi, K. (2002) · Readings in Economic Sociology · doi:10.1002/9780470755679.ch4 · Cited by 6,208
Rule of Experts: Egypt, Techno-Politics, Modernity
Mitchell, T. (2002) · doi:10.1525/9780520928251 · Cited by 3,693
Peck, J., & Tickell, A. (2002) · Antipode · doi:10.1111/1467-8330.00247 · Cited by 3,670
World development report, 2008: agriculture for development
(2008) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.45-4765 · Cited by 3,436
The Will to Improve: Governmentality, Development, and the Practice of Politics
Li, T. M. (2007) · TSpace (University of Toronto) · Cited by 2,437
Self-citation
Cited by
The new enclosures: critical perspectives on corporate land deals
White, B., Borras Jr., S. M., Hall, R., Scoones, I., & Wolford, W. (2012) · The Journal of Peasant Studies · doi:10.1080/03066150.2012.691879 · Cited by 913
Reconfiguring frontier spaces: The territorialization of resource control
Rasmussen, M. B., & Lund, C. (2018) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.01.018 · Cited by 566
Violent Inaction: The Necropolitical Experience of Refugees in Europe
Davies, T., Isakjee, A., & Dhesi, S. (2017) · Antipode · doi:10.1111/anti.12325 · Cited by 486
Debtfare States and the Poverty Industry: Money, discipline and the surplus population
Soederberg, S. (2014) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315761954 · Cited by 380
From extractivism to global extractivism: the evolution of an organizing concept
Chagnon, C. W., Durante, F., Gills, B. K., Hagolani-Albov, S. E., Hokkanen, S., Kangasluoma, S. M. J., Konttinen, H., Kröger, M., LaFleur, W., Ollinaho, O., et al. (2022) · The Journal of Peasant Studies · doi:10.1080/03066150.2022.2069015 · Cited by 377
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, T. M.
- Venue
- Antipode
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-01
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- s1
- Pages
- 66-93
- ISSN
- 0066-4812 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8330
- OpenAlex
- W2115251359
- Cited by
- 785
- References
- 67
- FWCI
- 72.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: To Make Live or Let Die? Rural Dispossession and the Protection of Surplus Populations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2009.00717.x
- The paper
- Li, T. M. (2010). To Make Live or Let Die? Rural Dispossession and the Protection of Surplus Populations. Antipode. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2009.00717.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.