The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Articulating Climate Justice in Copenhagen: Antagonism, the Commons, and Solidarity
Abstract
Abstract: Articulations of climate justice were central to the diverse mobilisations that opposed the Copenhagen Climate Talks in December 2009. This paper contends that articulations of climate justice pointed to the emergence of three co‐constitutive logics: antagonism, the common(s), and solidarity. Firstly, we argue that climate justice involves an antagonistic framing of climate politics that breaks with attempts to construct climate change as a “post‐political” issue. Secondly, we suggest that climate justice involves the formation of pre‐figurative political activity, expressed through acts of commoning. Thirdly, we contend that climate justice politics generates solidarities between differently located struggles and these solidarities have the potential to shift the terms of debate on climate change. Bringing these logics into conversation can develop the significance of climate justice for political practice and strategy. We conclude by considering what is at stake in different articulations of climate justice and tensions in emerging forms of climate politics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gibson, K. (2006) · Cited by 3,056
Why We Disagree about Climate Change: Understanding Controversy, Inaction and Opportunity
Hulme, M. (2009) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511841200 · Cited by 2,563
Mouffe, C. (2005) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,899
Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2009) · doi:10.2307/j.ctvjsf48h · Cited by 1,885
Defining Environmental Justice: Theories, Movements, and Nature
Schlosberg, D. (2007) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199286294.001.0001 · Cited by 1,796
The environmentalism of the poor: a study of ecological conflicts and valuation
(2003) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.40-4110 · Cited by 1,287
Defining environmental justice : theories, movements, and nature
Schlosberg, D. (2007) · Cited by 1,284
Swyngedouw, E. (2010) · Theory, Culture & Society · doi:10.1177/0263276409358728 · Cited by 1,255
The politics of climate change
Giddens, A. (2015) · Policy & Politics · doi:10.1332/030557315x14290856538163 · Cited by 1,054
The Magna Carta Manifesto: Liberties and Commons for All
Linebaugh, P. (2008) · University of California Press eBooks · doi:10.1525/9780520932708 · Cited by 691
Cited by
From environmental to climate justice: climate change and the discourse of environmental justice
Schlosberg, D., & Collins, L. B. (2014) · WIREs Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.275 · Cited by 1,374
Mapping the frontiers and front lines of global environmental justice: the EJAtlas
Temper, L., & Shmelev, S. (2015) · Journal of Political Ecology · doi:10.2458/v22i1.21108 · Cited by 577
Equity and Justice in Loss and Damage Finance: A Narrative Review of Catalysts and Obstacles
Uri, I., Robinson, S.-A., Roberts, J. T., Ciplet, D., Weikmans, R., & Khan, M. (2024) · Current Climate Change Reports · doi:10.1007/s40641-024-00196-6 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Chatterton, P., Featherstone, D., & Routledge, P.
- Venue
- Antipode
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-07-31
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 602-620
- ISSN
- 0066-4812 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8330
- OpenAlex
- W2113214343
- Cited by
- 324
- References
- 38
- FWCI
- 83.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Articulating Climate Justice in Copenhagen: Antagonism, the Commons, and Solidarity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2012.01025.x
- The paper
- Chatterton, P., Featherstone, D., & Routledge, P. (2013). Articulating Climate Justice in Copenhagen: Antagonism, the Commons, and Solidarity. Antipode. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2012.01025.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
