The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
ON CONFIDENCE INTERVALS FOR GENERALIZED ADDITIVE MODELS BASED ON PENALIZED REGRESSION SPLINES
Abstract
Summary: Generalized additive models represented using low rank penalized regression splines, estimated by penalized likelihood maximisation and with smoothness selected by generalized cross validation or similar criteria, provide a computationally efficient general framework for practical smooth modelling. Various authors have proposed approximate Bayesian interval estimates for such models, based on extensions of the work of Wahba, G. (1983)[Bayesian confidence intervals for the cross validated smoothing spline.J. R. Statist. Soc. B45, 133–150] and Silverman, B.W. (1985)[Some aspects of the spline smoothing approach to nonparametric regression curve fitting.J. R. Statist. Soc. B47, 1–52] on smoothing spline models of Gaussian data, but testing of such intervals has been rather limited and there is little supporting theory for the approximations used in the generalized case. This paper aims to improve this situation by providing simulation tests and obtaining asymptotic results supporting the approximations employed for the generalized case. The simulation results suggest that while across‐the‐model performance is good, component‐wise coverage probabilities are not as reliable. Since this is likely to result from the neglect of smoothing parameter variability, a simple and efficient simulation method is proposed to account for smoothing parameter uncertainty: this is demonstrated to substantially improve the performance of component‐wise intervals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Spline Models for Observational Data
Wahba, G. (1990) · doi:10.1137/1.9781611970128 · Cited by 4,184
Some aspects of the spline smoothing approach to non-parametric regression curve fitting
Silverman, B. W. (1985) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1985.tb01327.x · Cited by 1,117
Cited by
Hierarchical generalized additive models in ecology: an introduction with mgcv
Pedersen, E. J., Miller, D. L., Simpson, G. L., & Ross, N. (2019) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.6876 · Cited by 1,193
Association of urinary bisphenol a concentration with heart disease: evidence from NHANES 2003/06
Melzer, D., Rice, N. E., Lewis, C., Henley, W. E., & Galloway, T. S. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0008673 · Cited by 572
Shape constrained additive models
Pya, N., & Wood, S. N. (2015) · Statistics and Computing · doi:10.1007/s11222-013-9448-7 · Cited by 315
Self-citationCoverage Properties of Confidence Intervals for Generalized Additive Model Components
MARRA, G., & WOOD, S. N. (2012) · Scandinavian Journal of Statistics · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9469.2011.00760.x · Cited by 305
Self-citationStatistical procedures for developing earthquake damage fragility curves
Lallemant, D., Kiremidjian, A., & Burton, H. (2015) · Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics · doi:10.1002/eqe.2522 · Cited by 263
Metadata
- Authors
- Wood, S. N.
- Venue
- Australian & New Zealand Journal of Statistics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-12
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 445-464
- ISSN
- 1369-1473 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-842X
- OpenAlex
- W2087844041
- Cited by
- 205
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 2.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ON CONFIDENCE INTERVALS FOR GENERALIZED ADDITIVE MODELS BASED ON PENALIZED REGRESSION SPLINES. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-842x.2006.00450.x
- The paper
- Wood, S. N. (2006). ON CONFIDENCE INTERVALS FOR GENERALIZED ADDITIVE MODELS BASED ON PENALIZED REGRESSION SPLINES. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Statistics. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-842x.2006.00450.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.