The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Co‐Production and Health System Reform – From Re‐Imagining To Re‐Making
Abstract
There is growing interest in the application of citizen participation within all areas of public sector service development, where it is increasingly promoted as a significant strand of post‐neoliberal policy concerned with re‐imagining citizenship and more participatory forms of citizen/consumer engagement. The application of such a perspective within health services, via co‐production, has both beneficial, but also problematic implications for the organisation of such services, for professional practice and education. Given the disappointing results in increasing consumer involvement in health services via ‘choice’ and ‘voice’ participation strategies, the question of how the more challenging approach of co‐production will fare needs to be addressed. The article discusses the possibilities and challenges of system‐wide co‐production for health. It identifies the discourse and practice contours of co‐production, differentiating co‐production from other health consumer‐led approaches. Finally, it identifies issues critically related to the successful implementation of co‐production where additional theorisation and research are required.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
CONSUMERS AS COPRODUCERS OF PUBLIC SERVICES: SOME ECONOMIC AND INSTITUTIONAL CONSIDERATIONS
Parks, R. B., Baker, P. C., Kiser, L., Oakerson, R., Ostrom, E., Ostrom, V., Percy, S. L., Vandivort, M. B., Whitaker, G. P., & Wilson, R. (1981) · Policy Studies Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.1981.tb01208.x · Cited by 761
Cited by
Coproduction of healthcare service
Batalden, M., Batalden, P., Margolis, P., Seid, M., Armstrong, G., Opipari-Arrigan, L., & Hartung, H. (2016) · BMJ Quality & Safety · doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004315 · Cited by 1,078
Varieties of Participation in Public Services: The Who, When, and What of Coproduction
Nabatchi, T., Sancino, A., & Sicilia, M. (2017) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/puar.12765 · Cited by 848
Contextualizing co-production of health care: a systematic literature review
Palumbo, R. (2016) · International Journal of Public Sector Management · doi:10.1108/ijpsm-07-2015-0125 · Cited by 292
Masterson, D., Areskoug Josefsson, K., Robert, G., Nylander, E., & Kjellström, S. (2022) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.13470 · Cited by 281
Rütten, A., Frahsa, A., Abel, T., Bergmann, M., de Leeuw, E., Hunter, D., Jansen, M., King, A., & Potvin, L. (2019) · Health Promotion International · doi:10.1093/heapro/dax053 · Cited by 109
Metadata
- Authors
- Dunston, R., Lee, A., Boud, D., Brodie, P., & Chiarella, M.
- Venue
- Australian Journal of Public Administration
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-03
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 39-52
- ISSN
- 0313-6647 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8500
- OpenAlex
- W2097710854
- Cited by
- 243
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 26.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Co‐Production and Health System Reform – From Re‐Imagining To Re‐Making. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-8500.2008.00608.x
- The paper
- Dunston, R., Lee, A., Boud, D., Brodie, P., & Chiarella, M. (2009). Co‐Production and Health System Reform – From Re‐Imagining To Re‐Making. Australian Journal of Public Administration. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8500.2008.00608.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.