The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Does the discussion help? The impact of a formally assessed online discussion on final student results
Open accessAbstract
While there is agreement that participation in online asynchronous discussions can enhance student learning, it has also been identified that there is a need to investigate the impact of participation in online discussions on student course performance. This paper presents a case study based on an undergraduate engineering management unit employing a formally assessed online discussion area. It was observed that while many students read a significant number of discussion postings, generally, the posting of new and reply messages occurred at the minimum level required to qualify for the assignment marks. Based on correlation and multiple regression analysis, it was observed that two variables were significantly related to a student's final unit mark—prior academic ability and the number of new postings made to the online discussion. Each new posting contributed three times as much to the final unit mark as its nominal assessment value, suggesting that the work in preparing their new discussion postings assisted students in the completion of a range of assessable tasks for the unit. The number of postings read was not significantly correlated with the final unit mark, suggesting that passive lurking in this online discussion did not significantly contribute to student learning outcomes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Critical Inquiry in a Text-Based Environment: Computer Conferencing in Higher Education
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (1999) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/s1096-7516(00)00016-6 · Cited by 6,619
Cited by
Gašević, D., Dawson, S., Rogers, T., & Gasevic, D. (2016) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.10.002 · Cited by 683
Law, K. M. Y., Geng, S., & Li, T. (2019) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.02.021 · Cited by 426
Social presence in online discussions as a process predictor of academic performance
Joksimović, S., Gašević, D., Kovanović, V., Riecke, B. E., & Hatala, M. (2015) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12107 · Cited by 278
Cheng, G., & Chau, J. (2016) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12243 · Cited by 274
Using online discussion forums to support learning of paraphrasing
Tan, K. (2017) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12491 · Cited by 47
Metadata
- Authors
- Palmer, S., Holt, D., & Bray, S.
- Venue
- British Journal of Educational Technology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-08-19
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 847-858
- ISSN
- 0007-1013 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8535
- OpenAlex
- W2128045809
- Cited by
- 182
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 29.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Does the discussion help? The impact of a formally assessed online discussion on final student results. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00780.x
- The paper
- Palmer, S., Holt, D., & Bray, S. (2008). Does the discussion help? The impact of a formally assessed online discussion on final student results. British Journal of Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00780.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.