Cited by 426Online and Blended LearningVirtual Reality Applications and ImpactsEducational Technology and E-Learning

Student enrollment, motivation and learning performance in a blended learning environment: The mediating effects of social, teaching, and cognitive presence

Open access
Law, Kris M.Y., Geng, Shuang, Li, Tongmao·2019·Computers & Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compedu.2019.02.021

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Law, K. M. Y., Geng, S., & Li, T.
Affiliations
  • Deakin University (AU)
  • Shenzhen University (CN)
Corresponding author
Geng, Shuang
Venue
Computers & Education
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-07
Volume
136
Pages
1-12
ISSN
0360-1315 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2922395587
Cited by
426
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 71 · 2023: 95 · 2022: 94 · 2021: 63 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 13
FWCI
140.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Computers & Education (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology and E-Learning
Keywords
blended learning, student enrollment, student motivation, learning performance, social presence, teaching presence, cognitive presence, mediating effect, university students, course design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review