Cited by 347Innovation and Knowledge ManagementFirm Innovation and GrowthInnovation Diffusion and Forecasting

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Key Characteristics of the Large Innovating Firm*

Pavitt, K.·1991·British Journal of Management

Abstract

SUMMARY: Large innovating firms are a major source of the world's technology, and in the 20th century have shown great resilience in absorbing successive waves of radical innovations. The key characteristics of these firms derive from the properties of their innovative activities. First, given the specific, differentiated and cumulative nature of technological development, the range of possible choices about both product and processed technologies open to the firm depends on its accumulated competence. Second, given functional and professional specialization, the implementation of technological choices requires organization and orchestration across disciplinary, functional and divisional boundaries. Third, given cumulative development and uncertainty, the improvement of these competences requires continuous and collective learning. Fourth, in the light of these characteristics, systems for allocating resources must take into account the benefits of learning by doing, as well as the benefits of outcomes. As a consequence, the technical function in large firms involves not just the implementation of innovations, but also the definition of appropriate divisional objectives and boundaries, the exploration of radical technologies, and the formation of technological expectations about the future.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-8551.1991.tb00014.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Managers on site may need to adopt a learning-by-doing and learning-by-failing approach to acquire corporate competencies and work with local institutional actors and workers.

    “Managers on site may need to adopt a learning-by-doing and learning-by-failing approach (Pavitt, 1991) to acquire corporate competencies (e.g., knowledge of the local regulations) and work with the local institutional actors and workers.”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. 10.1016/0048-7333(87)90030-8 · DOI
  2. Allen T., 1977, Managing the Flow of Technology
  3. Aoki M., 1986, Horizontal vs. Vertical Information Structure of the Firm, American Economic Review, 76
  4. 10.1016/0048-7333(86)90012-0 · DOI
  5. 10.1002/smj.4250060104 · DOI
  6. Burns T., 1961, The Management of Innovation
  7. Chandler A., 1977, The Visible Hand: the Managerial Revolution in American Business
  8. Clark K. W.Chew andT.Fujimoto(1987). ‘Product Development in the World Auto Industry.Brookings Papers on Economic Activity No. 3. · DOI
  9. 10.1109/TEM.1983.6448637 · DOI
  10. Doz Y., 1989, Research on Technological Innovation Management and Policy
  11. Freeman C., 1982, The Economics of Industrial Innovation
  12. Hounshell D., 1989, Science and Corporate Strategy
  13. 10.1016/0048-7333(90)90043-6 · DOI
  14. 10.1109/TEM.1984.6447537 · DOI
  15. 10.1017/S0022050700030837 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/0014-4983(83)90024-4 · DOI
  17. 10.1017/CBO9780511664441 · DOI
  18. 10.1287/inte.14.1.126 · DOI
  19. Nelson R., 1982, An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change
  20. Orsenigo L., 1989, The Emergence of Biotechnology
  21. 10.1016/0048-7333(87)90024-2 · DOI
  22. Patel P., 1989, A Comparison of Technological Activities in FR Germany and the UK, National Westminster Quarterly Review
  23. Pavitt K., 1987, The Size Distribution of Innovating Firms in the UK: 1945–83, The Journal of Industrial Economics, 3
  24. 10.1287/mnsc.35.1.81 · DOI
  25. Penrose E., 1959, The Theory of the Growth of the Firm
  26. Pettigrew A., 1985, The Awakening Giant: Continuity and Change in Imperial Chemical Industries
  27. Pettigrew A., 1987, The Management of Strategic Change
  28. Reader W., 1975, Imperial Chemical Industries: A History
  29. Rosenberg N., 1985, The Uneasy Alliance: Managing the Productivity/Technology Dilemma
  30. 10.1017/CBO9780511561313 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Rosenbloom R., 1987, Technological Pioneering and Competitive Advantage: the Birth of the VCR Industry, California Management Review, 10.2307/41162131 · DOI
  32. 10.1111/j.1467-9310.1977.tb01334.x · DOI
  33. 10.1080/0267257X.1988.9964053 · DOI
  34. Schumpeter J., 1947, Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy
  35. 10.1111/j.1467-6486.1987.tb00445.x · DOI
  36. 10.1016/0014-2921(79)90024-2 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/0048-7333(86)90027-2 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.2307/2392832 · DOI
  39. Williamson O., 1975, Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Anti‐Trust Implications

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Pavitt, K.
Affiliations
University of Sussex (GB)
Corresponding author
Pavitt, K.
Venue
British Journal of Management
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1991-04
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
41-50
ISSN
  • 1045-3172 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8551
OpenAlex
W2164753928
Cited by
347
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 9
FWCI
43.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
British Journal of Management (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Firm Innovation and Growth
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting
Keywords
large corporations, innovation, technological progress, radical innovation, organizational learning, hands-on learning, resource allocation, technical functions, technological expectations, cumulative innovation, functional specialization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review