Cited by 47Innovation and Knowledge ManagementBusiness Strategy and InnovationEntrepreneurship Studies and Influences

Building Innovation Networks: Issues of Strategy and Expertise

Harris, Lisa, Coles, Anne-Marie, Dickson, Keith·2000·Technology Analysis & Strategic Management

Abstract

This article investigates the role of networks in new product development by reporting on a contemporary case study of a firm in the defence electronics sector. A specific focus is the development and ongoing management of a network that comprises a number of formal inter-firm strategic alliances. The paper begins by reviewing earlier literature on technology strategies for innovation that has identified a key role for inter-firm networking in the organization and management of new product development. We then consider the related issue of the relevant management expertise, which enables firms to adopt a network approach to their strategy for innovation by developing a competence in the process of network building. In this particular case study the critical issue centred upon the extent of the internal resources in terms of time and personal effort that was devoted to building trust and actively managing various inter-firm relationships over time. The article concludes that while inter-firm networking can facilitate new product development across firm boundaries, it is not a panacea for success. Whilst financially successful in terms of product and market development, the networking strategy has also set up problems within the particular case study firm in terms of resourcing and managing the very growth that has been generated.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/713698468

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Inter-firm networking can facilitate the innovation process but will not necessarily lead to innovation success.

    “Harris, Coles and Dickson (2000) find that inter-firm networking can facilitate the innovation process but it will not necessarily lead to innovation success.”

    From Networking and innovation: a systematic review of the evidence (2004) · cites this paper as Harris, Coles and Dickson (2000)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harris, L., Coles, A.-M., & Dickson, K.
Venue
Technology Analysis & Strategic Management
Published
2000-06
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
229-241
ISSN
  • 0953-7325 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-3990
OpenAlex
W1987582547
Cited by
47
References
46
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
5.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Technology Analysis and Strategic Management (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategy and Innovation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
Keywords
innovation networks, new product development, network construction, managerial expertise, trust building, inter-firm relationships, technology strategy, resource constraints, business growth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review