The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Glass Cliff: Evidence that Women are Over‐Represented in Precarious Leadership Positions
Open accessAbstract
There has been much research and conjecture concerning the barriers women face in trying to climb the corporate ladder, with evidence suggesting that they typically confront a ‘glass ceiling’ while men are more likely to benefit from a ‘glass escalator’. But what happens when women do achieve leadership roles? And what sorts of positions are they given? This paper argues that while women are now achieving more high profile positions, they are more likely than men to find themselves on a ‘glass cliff’, such that their positions are risky or precarious. This hypothesis was investigated in an archival study examining the performance of FTSE 100 companies before and after the appointment of a male or female board member. The study revealed that during a period of overall stock‐market decline those companies who appointed women to their boards were more likely to have experienced consistently bad performance in the preceding five months than those who appointed men. These results expose an additional, largely invisible, hurdle that women need to overcome in the workplace. Implications for the evaluation of women leaders are discussed and directions for future research are outlined.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders.
Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037//0033-295x.109.3.573 · Cited by 7,300
Cited by
Women in the Boardroom and Their Impact on Governance and Performance
Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2008) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1107721 · Cited by 1,202
The role of board gender and foreign ownership in the CSR performance of Chinese listed firms
McGuinness, P. B., Vieito, J. P., & Wang, M. (2017) · Journal of Corporate Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2016.11.001 · Cited by 939
Gender Diversity in Corporate Governance and Top Management
Francoeur, C., Labelle, R., & Sinclair-Desgagné, B. (2008) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-007-9482-5 · Cited by 927
Women on board: Does boardroom gender diversity affect firm risk?
Sila, V., Gonzalez, A., & Hagendorff, J. (2016) · Journal of Corporate Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2015.10.003 · Cited by 804
Backlash effects for disconfirming gender stereotypes in organizations
Rudman, L. A., & Phelan, J. E. (2008) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.riob.2008.04.003 · Cited by 776
Metadata
- Authors
- Ryan, M. K., & Haslam, S. A.
- Venue
- British Journal of Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-02-09
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 81-90
- ISSN
- 1045-3172 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8551
- OpenAlex
- W2121261567
- Cited by
- 1,277
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 32.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Glass Cliff: Evidence that Women are Over‐Represented in Precarious Leadership Positions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2005.00433.x
- The paper
- Ryan, M. K., & Haslam, S. A. (2005). The Glass Cliff: Evidence that Women are Over‐Represented in Precarious Leadership Positions. British Journal of Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2005.00433.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.