The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How Innovative are UK Firms? Evidence from the Fourth UK Community Innovation Survey on Synergies between Technological and Organizational Innovations
Open accessAbstract
Using data from the Fourth UK Community Innovation Survey this paper explores the diffusion of a range of innovative activities (encompassing process, product, machinery, marketing, organization, management and strategic innovations) across 16,383 British companies in 2004. Building upon a simple theoretical model it is shown that the use of each innovation is correlated with the use of all other innovations. It is shown that the range of innovations can be summarized by two multi‐innovation factors, labelled here ‘organizational’ and ‘technological’, that are complements but not substitutes for each other. Three clusters of firms are identified where intensity of use of the two sets of innovations is below average (56.9% of the sample); intermediate but above average (23.7%); and highly above average (19.4%). Distinctive characteristics are found to be common to the companies in each cluster. Finally, it is shown that innovativeness tends to persist over time.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R & D
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1989) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2233763 · Cited by 7,530
A Framework for the Comparative Analysis of Organizations
Perrow, C. (1967) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2091811 · Cited by 2,509
Measuring and Explaining Management Practices Across Firms and Countries
Bloom, N., & Van Reenen, J. (2007) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/qjec.2007.122.4.1351 · Cited by 2,373
Berman, E., Bound, J., & Griliches, Z. (1994) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/2118467 · Cited by 1,870
Corporate Restructuring and New Forms of Organizing: Evidence from Europe
Ruigrok, W., Pettigrew, A., Peck, S., & Whittington, R. (1999) · Management International Review · doi:10.1007/978-3-322-90991-6_4 · Cited by 52
Cited by
Camisón, C., & Villar-López, A. (2014) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.06.004 · Cited by 1,081
Unveiling the impact of the adoption of digital technologies on firms’ innovation performance
Usai, A., Fiano, F., Messeni Petruzzelli, A., Paoloni, P., Farina Briamonte, M., & Orlando, B. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.035 · Cited by 553
Demirel, P., & Danisman, G. O. (2019) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2336 · Cited by 322
Footnotes to Research on Management Innovation
Damanpour, F. (2014) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840614539312 · Cited by 317
Product innovation and firm performance in transition economies: A multi-stage estimation approach
Ramadani, V., Hisrich, R. D., Abazi-Alili, H., Dana, L.-P., Panthi, L., & Abazi-Bexheti, L. (2019) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.12.010 · Cited by 267
Metadata
- Authors
- Battisti, G., & Stoneman, P.
- Venue
- British Journal of Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-02-18
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 187-206
- ISSN
- 1045-3172 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8551
- OpenAlex
- W2023827811
- Cited by
- 309
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 14.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How Innovative are UK Firms? Evidence from the Fourth UK Community Innovation Survey on Synergies between Technological and Organizational Innovations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2009.00629.x
- The paper
- Battisti, G., & Stoneman, P. (2010). How Innovative are UK Firms? Evidence from the Fourth UK Community Innovation Survey on Synergies between Technological and Organizational Innovations. British Journal of Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2009.00629.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
