The DOI matches its OpenAlex record.
The Adult-Child Dyad as a Problem-Solving System
Abstract
WERTSCH, JAMES V.; MCNAMEE, GILLIAN DOWLEY; MCLANE, JOAN B.; and BUDWIG, NANCY A. The Adult-Child Dyad as a Problem-solving System. CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 1980, 51, 12151221. This study investigates the way that mothers and their preschool children divided up the strategic responsibilities for carrying out a problem-solving task which involves making a puzzle in accordance with a model. The interaction of 18 mother-child dyads was videotaped and analyzed for verbal and nonverbal devices used by the adult to regulate the child's behavior. The child's eye gaze to the model was used as a measure of how well he or she was following an effective strategy. It was found that with an increase in age there was a decrease in the proportion of these eye gazes that were regulated by the adult and thus an increase in self-regulated strategic behavior. In addition, it was found that when an older child looked at the model, he or she was likely to carry out the subsequent steps necessary to select a piece and insert it correctly and independently in the copy puzzle, whereas younger children were likely to need additional adult assistance after an eye gaze to the model. This is interpreted as suggesting that older children differed from younger ones in their understanding of the strategic significance of gaze behaviors and that the adults' communicative moves were fulfilling different functions for children at different ages. It is argued that an analysis of how adult-child dyads carry out tasks requiring strategic skills can result in a better understanding of the origins and development of these skills iri independently functioning cognitive agents.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Practices of Distributed Intelligence and Designs for Education
(1993) · HAL · Cited by 1,046
Critical distinctions among three approaches to peer education
Damon, W., & Phelps, E. (1989) · International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1016/0883-0355(89)90013-x · Cited by 538
Social Processes in Early Number Development
Saxe, G. B., Guberman, S. R., Gearhart, M., Gelman, R., Massey, C. M., & Rogoff, B. (1987) · Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development · doi:10.2307/1166071 · Cited by 437
Help-Seeking Behavior in Learning
Gall, S. N.-L. (1985) · Review of Research in Education · doi:10.2307/1167146 · Cited by 237
Scaffolding dynamically toward change: Previous and new perspectives
Granott, N. (2005) · New Ideas in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2006.07.002 · Cited by 68
Metadata
- Authors
- Wertsch, J. V., McNamee, G. D., McLane, J. B., & Budwig, N.
- Venue
- Child Development
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1980-12-01
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1215-1215
- ISSN
- 0009-3920 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2032285916
- Cited by
- 251
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Adult-Child Dyad as a Problem-Solving System. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1980.tb02672.x
- The paper
- Wertsch, J. V., McNamee, G. D., McLane, J. B., & Budwig, N. (1980). The Adult-Child Dyad as a Problem-Solving System. Child Development. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1980.tb02672.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.