The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Global Developmental Trend in Cognitive Processing Speed
Abstract
Children respond more slowly than young adults on a variety of information-processing tasks. The global trend hypothesis posits that processing speed changes as a function of age, and that all component processes change at the same rate. A unique prediction of this hypothesis is that the overall response latencies of children of a particular age should be predictable from the latencies of young adults performing the same tasks--without regard to the specific componential makeup of the task. The current effort tested this prediction by examining the performance of 4 age groups (10-, 12-, 15-, and 19-year-olds) on 4 different tasks (choice reaction time, letter matching, mental rotation, and abstract matching). An analysis that simultaneously examined performance on all 4 tasks provided strong support for the global trend hypothesis. By plotting each child group's performance on all 4 tasks as a function of the young adult group's performance in the corresponding task conditions, precise linear functions were revealed: 10-year-olds were approximately 1.8 times slower than young adults on all tasks, and 12-year-olds were approximately 1.5 times slower, whereas 15-year-olds appeared to process information as fast as young adults.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method
Sternberg, S. (1969) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/0001-6918(69)90055-9 · Cited by 3,137
Aging and Information-Processing Rate
Cerella, J. (1990) · Handbook of the Psychology of Aging · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-101280-9.50018-8 · Cited by 472
Developmental Patterns in the Solution of Verbal Analogies
Sternberg, R. J., & Nigro, G. (1980) · Child Development · doi:10.2307/1129586 · Cited by 176
Cited by
Assessment and Development of Executive Function (EF) During Childhood
Anderson, P. (2002) · Child Neuropsychology · doi:10.1076/chin.8.2.71.8724 · Cited by 2,218
“Processing speed and fluency continues to improve during middle childhood (Anderson et al., 2000; Hale, 1990; Welsh et al., 1991), with significant gains in processing speed observed between 9–10 years and 11–12 years (Kail, 1986).”
BackgroundMaturation of Cognitive Processes From Late Childhood to Adulthood
Luna, B., Garver, K. E., Urban, T. A., Lazar, N. A., & Sweeney, J. A. (2004) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00745.x · Cited by 1,351
Life Span Theory in Developmental Psychology
Baltes, P. B., Lindenberger, U., & Staudinger, U. M. (2007) · Handbook of Child Psychology · doi:10.1002/9780470147658.chpsy0111 · Cited by 1,240
Development of inhibitory control across the life span.
Williams, B. R., Ponesse, J. S., Schachar, R. J., Logan, G. D., & Tannock, R. (1999) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.35.1.205 · Cited by 889
Processing speed as a mental capacity
Kail, R., & Salthouse, T. A. (1994) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/0001-6918(94)90003-5 · Cited by 850
Metadata
- Authors
- Hale, S.
- Venue
- Child Development
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1990-06-01
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 653-653
- ISSN
- 0009-3920 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2153605877
- Cited by
- 295
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 4.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Global Developmental Trend in Cognitive Processing Speed. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1990.tb02809.x
- The paper
- Hale, S. (1990). A Global Developmental Trend in Cognitive Processing Speed. Child Development. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1990.tb02809.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.