The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Dyadic Nature of Bullying and Victimization: Testing a Dual-Perspective Theory
Open accessAbstract
For this study, information on Who Bullies Who was collected from 54 school classes with 918 children (M age = 11) and 13,606 dyadic relations. Bullying and victimization were viewed separately from the point of view of the bully and the victim. The two perspectives were highly complementary. The probability of a bully–victim relationship was higher if the bully was more dominant than the victim, and if the victim was more vulnerable than the bully and more rejected by the class. In a bully–victim dyad, boys were more often the bullies. There was no finding of sex effect for victimization. Liking reduced and disliking increased the probability of a bully–victim relationship.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Power, approach, and inhibition.
Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Anderson, C. (2003) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.110.2.265 · Cited by 3,427
The Ontogenesis of Social Dominance: A Strategy-Based Evolutionary Perspective
Hawley, P. H. (1999) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1006/drev.1998.0470 · Cited by 877
Boivin, M., Hymel, S., & Bukowski, W. M. (1995) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s0954579400006830 · Cited by 661
Evaluating Montessori education.
Lillard, A., & Else-Quest, N. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1132362 · Cited by 482
Salmivalli, C., & Isaacs, J. (2005) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00841.x-i1 · Cited by 291
Boulton, M. J. (1999) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00068 · Cited by 138
Cited by
Tokunaga, R. S. (2010) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2009.11.014 · Cited by 2,566
Peer Relationships in Adolescence
Brown, B. B., & Larson, J. (2009) · Handbook of Adolescent Psychology · doi:10.1002/9780470479193.adlpsy002004 · Cited by 1,208
Bullying victimization in youths and mental health problems: ‘Much ado about nothing’
Arseneault, L., Bowes, L., & Shakoor, S. (2010) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291709991383 · Cited by 1,067
Understanding the psychology of bullying: Moving toward a social-ecological diathesis–stress model.
Swearer, S. M., & Hymel, S. (2015) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/a0038929 · Cited by 666
Empirical test of bullies' status goals: assessing direct goals, aggression, and prestige
Sijtsema, J. J., Veenstra, R., Lindenberg, S., & Salmivalli, C. (2009) · Aggressive Behavior · doi:10.1002/ab.20282 · Cited by 395
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Veenstra, R., Lindenberg, S., Zijlstra, B. J. H., De Winter, A. F., Verhulst, F. C., & Ormel, J.
- Venue
- Child Development
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2007-11-01
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1843-1854
- ISSN
- 0009-3920 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8624
- OpenAlex
- W2117458710
- Cited by
- 274
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 19.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Dyadic Nature of Bullying and Victimization: Testing a Dual-Perspective Theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01102.x
- The paper
- Veenstra, R., Lindenberg, S., Zijlstra, B. J. H., De Winter, A. F., Verhulst, F. C., & Ormel, J. (2007). The Dyadic Nature of Bullying and Victimization: Testing a Dual-Perspective Theory. Child Development. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01102.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
