Cited by 57Infant Development and Preterm CareChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Aspects of fetal learning and memory

Open access
Dirix, Chantal E H, Nijhuis, Jan G, Jongsma, Henk W, Hornstra, Gerard·2009·Child Development

Abstract

Ninety-three pregnant women were recruited to assess fetal learning and memory, based on habituation to repeated vibroacoustic stimulation of fetuses of 30–38 weeks gestational age (GA). Each habituation test was repeated 10 min later to estimate the fetal short-term memory. For Groups 30–36, both measurements were replicated in a second session at 38 weeks GA for the assessment of fetal long-term memory. Within the time frame considered, fetal learning appeared GA independent. Furthermore, fetuses were observed to have a short-term (10-min) memory from at least 30 weeks GA onward, which also appeared independent of fetal age. In addition, results indicated that 34-week-old fetuses are able to store information and retrieve it 4 weeks later.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01329.x

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. de Bie, S. E. (1987). Standaardvragen 1987: Voorstellen voor uniformering van vraagstellingen naar achtergrondkenmer- ken en interviews [Standard questions 1987: Proposal for uniformisation of questions regarding background vari- ables and interviews] (2nd ed.). Leiden, Netherlands: Leiden University Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dirix, C. E. H., Nijhuis, J. G., Jongsma, H. W., & Hornstra, G.
Affiliations
  • Maastricht University Medical Centre (NL)
  • Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
Corresponding author
Nijhuis, Jan G
Venue
Child Development
Published
2009-07-01
Volume
80
Issue
4
Pages
1251-1258
ISSN
  • 0009-3920 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8624
OpenAlex
W1992540109
Cited by
57
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
4.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Child Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
fetal learning, fetal memory, habituation, vibroacoustic stimulation, short-term memory, long-term memory, gestational age, fetal development, prenatal auditory stimulation
MeSH terms
Acoustics, Female, Humans, Learning, Memory, Pregnancy, Mental Recall, Time Factors, Vibration, Fetal Development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review