The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Position‐Invariant Neural Network for Digital Pavement Crack Analysis
Open accessAbstract
Abstract: This article presents an integrated neural network‐based crack imaging system to classify crack types of digital pavement images. This system includes three neural networks: (1) image‐based neural network, (2) histogram‐based neural network, and (3) proximity‐based neural network. These three neural networks were developed to classify various crack types based on the subimages (crack tiles) rather than crack pixels in digital pavement images. These spatial neural networks were trained using artificially generated data following the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) guidelines. The optimal architecture of each neural network was determined based on the testing results from different sets of the number of hidden units, learning coefficients, and the number of training epochs. To validate the system, actual pavement pictures taken from pavements as well as the computer‐generated data were used. The proximity value is determined by computing relative distribution of crack tiles within the image. The proximity‐based neural network effectively searches the patterns of various crack types in both horizontal and vertical directions while maintaining its position invariance. The final result indicates that the proximity‐based neural network produced the best result with the accuracy of 95.2% despite its simplest neural network structure with the least computing requirement.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Automatic Pixel‐Level Crack Detection and Measurement Using Fully Convolutional Network
Yang, X., Li, H., Yu, Y., Luo, X., Huang, T., & Yang, X. (2018) · Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering · doi:10.1111/mice.12412 · Cited by 852
Automatic Road Crack Detection and Characterization
Oliveira, H., & Correia, P. L. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2012.2208630 · Cited by 537
Li, S., Zhao, X., & Zhou, G. (2019) · Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering · doi:10.1111/mice.12433 · Cited by 490
Machine Learning for Crack Detection: Review and Model Performance Comparison
Hsieh, Y.-A., & Tsai, Y. J. (2020) · Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering · doi:10.1061/(asce)cp.1943-5487.0000918 · Cited by 420
Zakeri, H., Nejad, F. M., & Fahimifar, A. (2017) · Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering · doi:10.1007/s11831-016-9194-z · Cited by 304
Metadata
- Authors
- Lee, B. J., & Lee, H. “.
- Venue
- Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-01-06
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 105-118
- ISSN
- 1093-9687 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8667
- OpenAlex
- W2030398544
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Position‐Invariant Neural Network for Digital Pavement Crack Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-8667.2004.00341.x
- The paper
- Lee, B. J., & Lee, H. “. (2004). Position‐Invariant Neural Network for Digital Pavement Crack Analysis. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8667.2004.00341.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.