The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Corporate Governance and Board Composition: diversity and independence of Australian boards
Abstract
The board of directors is one of a number of internal governance mechanisms that are intended to ensure that the interests of shareholders and managers are closely aligned, and to discipline or remove ineffective management teams. Among the most significant governance issues currently faced by the modern corporation are those relating to diversity, such as gender and age, and independence of directors. While board diversity and independence has been a growing area of research in recent years, most empirical research on this topic has been restricted to US data. The generalisability of such findings may not extend across national boundaries due to different regulatory and economic environments, cultural differences, the size of capital markets and the effectiveness of governance mechanisms. Consequently, the importance and value of various governance structures, including board diversity and independence, should be separately examined in each country, and the influential factors investigated. This study reports on the diversity and independence of the board membership of 100 top Australian companies in 2003. Australia has one of the most developed stock markets in the Asia‐Pacific region. With the collapse of several well‐known public companies such as Ansett, OneTel and HIH, there is an increasing demand to evaluate the corporate governance practices of Australian companies, including the composition of boards. Accordingly, this research provides a timely review of the state of corporate governance in Australia so far as board composition is concerned.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Milliken, F. J., & Martins, L. L. (1996) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1996.9605060217 · Cited by 3,413
Book Review: Discovering Statistics Using SPSS
Field, A., & Gaitanou, C. (2005) · PsyPag Quarterly · doi:10.53841/bpspag.2005.1.56.31 · Cited by 679
Cited by
Women on board: Does boardroom gender diversity affect firm risk?
Sila, V., Gonzalez, A., & Hagendorff, J. (2016) · Journal of Corporate Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2015.10.003 · Cited by 804
Corporate governance and environmental reporting: an Australian study
Kathy Rao, K., Tilt, C. A., & Lester, L. H. (2012) · Corporate Governance: The international journal of business in society · doi:10.1108/14720701211214052 · Cited by 444
Chen, P., & Hao, Y. (2022) · Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management · doi:10.1002/csr.2324 · Cited by 322
Does Confucianism Reduce Board Gender Diversity? Firm-Level Evidence from China
Du, X. (2016) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2508-x · Cited by 273
Grosvold, J., & Brammer, S. (2011) · Corporate Governance: An International Review · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8683.2010.00830.x · Cited by 256
Metadata
- Authors
- Kang, H., Cheng, M., & Gray, S. J.
- Venue
- Corporate Governance: An International Review
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-03
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 194-207
- ISSN
- 0964-8410 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8683
- OpenAlex
- W2010751726
- Cited by
- 718
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 45.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Corporate Governance and Board Composition: diversity and independence of Australian boards. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00554.x
- The paper
- Kang, H., Cheng, M., & Gray, S. J. (2007). Corporate Governance and Board Composition: diversity and independence of Australian boards. Corporate Governance: An International Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00554.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.