Cited by 448Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsCognitive Science and Education Research

The Role of Emotion in Decision Making: A Cognitive Neuroscience Perspective

Naqvi, Nasir, Shiv, Baba, Bechara, Antoine·2006·Current Directions in Psychological Science

Abstract

Decision making often occurs in the face of uncertainty about whether one's choices will lead to benefit or harm. The somatic-marker hypothesis is a neurobiological theory of how decisions are made in the face of uncertain outcome. This theory holds that such decisions are aided by emotions, in the form of bodily states, that are elicited during the deliberation of future consequences and that mark different options for behavior as being advantageous or disadvantageous. This process involves an interplay between neural systems that elicit emotional/bodily states and neural systems that map these emotional/bodily states.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2006.00448.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Emotional and intellectual intelligence are differentiable concepts.

    “Since 1994, moreover, an overwhelming volume of evidence, especially in neuroscience, has accumulated in support of the idea that emotional awareness and understanding is separate from intellectual intelligence, and these abilities directly impact human decision-making capabilities (e.g., see Naqvi, Shiv, & Bechara, 2006).”

    From Does leadership need emotional intelligence? (2009) · cites this paper as Naqvi, Shiv, & Bechara, 2006

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Naqvi, N., Shiv, B., & Bechara, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Iowa (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
Venue
Current Directions in Psychological Science
Published
2006-10
Volume
15
Issue
5
Pages
260-264
ISSN
  • 0963-7214 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8721
OpenAlex
W2139437539
Cited by
448
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 29
FWCI
6.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Current Directions in Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Cognitive Science and Education Research
Keywords
emotions, decision-making, somatic marker hypothesis, uncertainty, bodily states, affective evaluation, neural systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review