The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cross‐Community Contact, Perceived Status Differences, and Intergroup Attitudes in Northern Ireland: The Mediating Roles of Individual‐level versus Group‐level Threats and the Moderating Role of Social Identification
Abstract
We tested a model which examined the relationship between contact quantity and quality, relative ingroup status, and intergroup attitudes in Northern Ireland. Intergroup anxiety was considered an individual‐level mediator and realistic and symbolic threat as group‐level mediators in the model. We examined the idea that the strength of ingroup identification moderates the predictive power of individual‐ versus group‐level variables. Both contact and relative ingroup status predicted anxiety and perceived threats to the ingroup, which were significant mediators in the model. Our results also suggest that while anxiety predicts attitudes for low but not high identifiers, symbolic threats to the ingroup are more important for high than for low identifiers. There was also some evidence indicating that status perceptions moderate contact effects. We discuss these results in terms of their implications for intergroup relations in Northern Ireland.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory.
Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006) · Journal of personality and social psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751 · Cited by 9,708 · cited 2×
“contact on anxiety, which is consistent with the idea that perceived lower status of one’s ingroup can undermine contact effects ( Pettigrew & Tropp, 2006 ).”
BackgroundResultTo parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits
Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K. F. (2002) · Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1207/s15328007sem0902_1 · Cited by 6,552
Research works printed but not linked: 28
- Allport G. W., 1954, The nature of prejudice
- 10.1207/S15324834BASP2303_5 · DOI
- 10.1002/ejsp.2420240603 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1146/annurev.ps.36.020185.001251 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.2044-8325.1986.tb00230.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0065-2601(05)37005-5 · DOI · Paper page
- Cairns E., 1982, Social identity and intergroup relations, 277
- Cairns E., 1998, The conflict in Northern Ireland: Causes, consequences and controls, American Psychologist, 53, 757, 10.1037/0003-066X.53.7.754 · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.53.7.754 · Paper page
- 10.3102/00028312032001099 · DOI
- Durrheim K., 2005, Racial encounter: The social psychology of contact and desegregation
- 10.1007/978-1-349-23829-3_3 · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-23829-3_3
- Hewstone M., 2005, The social psychology of inclusion and exclusion, 265
- 10.1080/10705519909540118 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1108/eb022854 · doi:10.1108/eb022854
- 10.1177/0146167293196005 · DOI · Paper page
- Kline R. B., 1998, Principles and practice of structural equation modeling
- 10.1177/0193841X9301700202 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0147-1767(99)00035-8 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0146167203262848 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0146167297232006 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/BF02294104 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/01461672022812009 · DOI · Paper page
- Stephan W. G., 2003, From prejudice to intergroup emotions: Differentiated reactions to social groups, 191
- 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1985.tb01134.x · DOI · Paper page
- Stephan W. G., 2000, Reducing prejudice and discrimination, 23
- Tausch N., 2005, Psychological approaches to dealing with conflict and war, 67
- Turner J. C., 1987, Rediscovering the social group: A self‐categorization theory
- 10.1037/0022-3514.73.1.73 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.73.1.73 · Paper page
Cited by
Lemmer, G., & Wagner, U. (2015) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2079 · Cited by 522
Improving intergroup relations with extended and vicarious forms of indirect contact
Vezzali, L., Hewstone, M., Capozza, D., Giovannini, D., & Wölfer, R. (2014) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/10463283.2014.982948 · Cited by 278
Self-citationCollective narcissism and anti-Semitism in Poland
Golec de Zavala, A., & Cichocka, A. (2012) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430211420891 · Cited by 253
Dovidio, J. F., & Gaertner, S. L. (2010) · Handbook of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/9780470561119.socpsy002029 · Cited by 218
Collective Narcissism: Political Consequences of Investing Self‐Worth in the Ingroup’s Image
Golec de Zavala, A., Dyduch‐Hazar, K., & Lantos, D. (2019) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12569 · Cited by 200
Metadata
- Authors
- Tausch, N., Hewstone, M., Kenworthy, J., Cairns, E., & Christ, O.
- Venue
- Political Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-12-20
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 53-68
- ISSN
- 0162-895X (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9221
- OpenAlex
- W2133796477
- Cited by
- 166
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cross‐Community Contact, Perceived Status Differences, and Intergroup Attitudes in Northern Ireland: The Mediating Roles of Individual‐level versus Group‐level Threats and the Moderating Role of Social Identification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2007.00551.x
- The paper
- Tausch, N., Hewstone, M., Kenworthy, J., Cairns, E., & Christ, O. (2007). Cross‐Community Contact, Perceived Status Differences, and Intergroup Attitudes in Northern Ireland: The Mediating Roles of Individual‐level versus Group‐level Threats and the Moderating Role of Social Identification. Political Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2007.00551.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
