Cited by 540Psychology of Moral and Emotional JudgmentSocial and Intergroup PsychologyCultural Differences and Values

Moralization and Becoming a Vegetarian: The Transformation of Preferences Into Values and the Recruitment of Disgust

Rozin, Paul, Markwith, Maureen, Stoess, Caryn·1997·Psychological Science

Abstract

We describe a rather common process that we call moralization, in which objects or activities that were previously morally neutral acquire a moral component. Moralization converts preferences into values, and in doing so influences cross-generational transmission (because values are passed more effectively in families than are preferences), increases the likelihood of internalization, invokes greater emotional response, and mobilizes the support of governmental and other cultural institutions. In recent decades, we claim, cigarette smoking in America has become moralized. We support our claims about some of the consequences of moralization with an analysis of differences between health and moral vegetarians. Compared with health vegetarians, moral vegetarians find meat more disgusting, offer more reasons in support of their meat avoidance, and avoid a wider range of animal foods. However, contrary to our prediction, liking for meat is about the same in moral and health vegetarians.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00685.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Authors
Rozin, P., Markwith, M., & Stoess, C.
Affiliations
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Venue
Psychological Science
Published
1997-03
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
67-73
ISSN
  • 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9280
OpenAlex
W2118904283
Cited by
540
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 17
FWCI
2.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
Keywords
moralization, vegetarian diet, meat avoidance, disgust, moral values, preferences, intergenerational transmission, internalization, social norms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review