Moralization and Becoming a Vegetarian: The Transformation of Preferences Into Values and the Recruitment of Disgust
Abstract
We describe a rather common process that we call moralization, in which objects or activities that were previously morally neutral acquire a moral component. Moralization converts preferences into values, and in doing so influences cross-generational transmission (because values are passed more effectively in families than are preferences), increases the likelihood of internalization, invokes greater emotional response, and mobilizes the support of governmental and other cultural institutions. In recent decades, we claim, cigarette smoking in America has become moralized. We support our claims about some of the consequences of moralization with an analysis of differences between health and moral vegetarians. Compared with health vegetarians, moral vegetarians find meat more disgusting, offer more reasons in support of their meat avoidance, and avoid a wider range of animal foods. However, contrary to our prediction, liking for meat is about the same in moral and health vegetarians.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Moral attitudes are more durable and resistant to temptation, and are associated with stronger reactions to dissimilar others.
“For example, moral attitudes are more durable and resistant to temptation [13], and are associated with stronger reactions to dissimilar others [23], both of which are indicators of attitude strength [58].”
From The Importance of Moral Construal: Moral versus Non-Moral Construal Elicits Faster, More Extreme, Universal Evaluations of the Same Actions (2012) · cites this paper as [13]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hoek, A. C., Luning, P. A., Weijzen, P., Engels, W., Kok, F. J., & de Graaf, C. (2011) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2011.02.001 · Cited by 757 · see citing works
Horberg, E. J., Oveis, C., & Keltner, D. (2011) · Emotion Review · doi:10.1177/1754073911402384 · Cited by 339 · see citing works
Cooking and disgust sensitivity influence preference for attending insect-based food events
Hamerman, E. J. (2016) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2015.09.029 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Van Bavel, J. J., Packer, D. J., Haas, I. J., & Cunningham, W. A. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0048693 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
- Authors
- Rozin, P., Markwith, M., & Stoess, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- ORCID
- Rozin, Paul
- Venue
- Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1997-03
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 67-73
- ISSN
- 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9280
- OpenAlex
- W2118904283
- Cited by
- 540
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 17
- FWCI
- 2.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
- Keywords
- moralization, vegetarian diet, meat avoidance, disgust, moral values, preferences, intergenerational transmission, internalization, social norms
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review