Cited by 339Psychology of Moral and Emotional JudgmentEmotions and Moral BehaviorEthics in Business and Education

Emotions as Moral Amplifiers: An Appraisal Tendency Approach to the Influences of Distinct Emotions upon Moral Judgment

Horberg, Elizabeth J., Oveis, Christopher, Keltner, Dacher·2011·Emotion Review

Abstract

In this article, we advance the perspective that distinct emotions amplify different moral judgments, based on the emotion’s core appraisals. This theorizing yields four insights into the way emotions shape moral judgment. We submit that there are two kinds of specificity in the impact of emotion upon moral judgment: domain specificity and emotion specificity. We further contend that the unique embodied aspects of an emotion, such as nonverbal expressions and physiological responses, contribute to an emotion’s impact on moral judgment. Finally, emotions play a key role in determining which issues acquire moral significance in a society over time, in a process known as moralization (Rozin, 1999). The implications of these four observations for future research on emotion and morality are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1754073911402384

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Horberg, E. J., Oveis, C., & Keltner, D.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Horberg, Elizabeth J.
Venue
Emotion Review
Published
2011-06-28
Volume
3
Issue
3
Pages
237-244
ISSN
  • 1754-0739 (ISSN-L)
  • 1754-0747
OpenAlex
W2145077330
Cited by
339
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 62 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 11
FWCI
8.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Emotion Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Ethics in Business and Education
Keywords
emotions, moral judgment, domain specificity, emotion specificity, embodied emotion, nonverbal expression, physiological responses, moralization, moral significance, emotions and morality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review