The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Recommendations Implicit in Policy Defaults
Abstract
Should people be considered organ donors after their death unless they request not to be, or should they not be considered donors unless they request to be? Because people tend to stay with the default in a variety of domains, policymakers' choice of default has large and often important effects. In the United States, where the organ-donation policy default is “not a donor,” about 5,000 people die every year because there are too few donors. Four experiments examined two domains—being an organ donor and saving for retirement—where default effects occur and have important implications. The results indicate that default effects occur in part because policymakers' attitudes can be revealed through their choice of default, and people perceive the default as indicating the recommended course of action. Policymakers need to be aware of the implicit messages conveyed by their choice of default.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1991) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/2937956 · Cited by 6,432
Defaults, Framing and Privacy: Why Opting In-Opting Out1
Johnson, E. J., Bellman, S., & Lohse, G. L. (2002) · Marketing Letters · doi:10.1023/a:1015044207315 · Cited by 388
On site: to opt-in or opt-out?: it depends on the question
Bellman, S., Johnson, E. J., & Lohse, G. L. (2001) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/359205.359241 · Cited by 100
Johnson, E. J., & Goldstein, D. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1091721 · Cited by 35
Cited by
Privacy and human behavior in the age of information
Acquisti, A., Brandimarte, L., & Loewenstein, G. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaa1465 · Cited by 1,879
When and why defaults influence decisions: a meta-analysis of default effects
JACHIMOWICZ, J. M., DUNCAN, S., WEBER, E. U., & JOHNSON, E. J. (2019) · Behavioural Public Policy · doi:10.1017/bpp.2018.43 · Cited by 481
How Can Measures of Subjective Well-Being Be Used to Inform Public Policy?
Dolan, P., & White, M. P. (2007) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00030.x · Cited by 416
Partitioning default effects: Why people choose not to choose.
Dinner, I., Johnson, E. J., Goldstein, D. G., & Liu, K. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied · doi:10.1037/a0024354 · Cited by 340
Nudge Versus Boost: How Coherent are Policy and Theory?
Grüne-Yanoff, T., & Hertwig, R. (2016) · Minds and Machines · doi:10.1007/s11023-015-9367-9 · Cited by 338
Metadata
- Authors
- McKenzie, C. R. M., Liersch, M. J., & Finkelstein, S. R.
- Venue
- Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2006-05
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 414-420
- ISSN
- 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9280
- OpenAlex
- W2126169472
- Cited by
- 518
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 5.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recommendations Implicit in Policy Defaults. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01721.x
- The paper
- McKenzie, C. R. M., Liersch, M. J., & Finkelstein, S. R. (2006). Recommendations Implicit in Policy Defaults. Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01721.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.