The DOI matches its Crossref record; 132 of the 132 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nudge Versus Boost: How Coherent are Policy and Theory?
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1914185 · Cited by 48,524
Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1988) · Decision, Probability and Utility · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511609220.014 · Cited by 32,474
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1975) · Utility, Probability, and Human Decision Making · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-1834-0_8 · Cited by 22,650
Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992) · Journal of Risk and Uncertainty · doi:10.1007/bf00122574 · Cited by 15,467
(2011) · Cited by 14,317
Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness
(2008) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.46-0977 · Cited by 11,572
Research in Organizational Behavior.
Grimes, A. J., Cummings, L. L., & Staw, B. M. (1986) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392975 · Cited by 10,899
Fodor, J. A. (1983) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/4737.001.0001 · Cited by 7,734
Well-being : the foundations of hedonic psychology
Kahneman, D. J., Diener, E. F., & Schwarz, N. (1999) · Cited by 7,466
Cited by
ElHaffar, G., Durif, F., & Dubé, L. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122556 · Cited by 745
Sustainable packaging for supply chain management in the circular economy: A review
Meherishi, L., Narayana, S. A., & Ranjani, K. S. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.07.057 · Cited by 341
Damgaard, M. T., & Nielsen, H. S. (2018) · Economics of Education Review · doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2018.03.008 · Cited by 321
Self-nudging and the citizen choice architect
REIJULA, S., & HERTWIG, R. (2022) · Behavioural Public Policy · doi:10.1017/bpp.2020.5 · Cited by 130
Self-citationUnderstanding health behavior change by motivation and reward mechanisms: a review of the literature
Michaelsen, M. M., & Esch, T. (2023) · Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2023.1151918 · Cited by 114
Metadata
- Authors
- Grüne-Yanoff, T., & Hertwig, R.
- Venue
- Minds and Machines
- Published
- 2015-04-23
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 149-183
- ISSN
- 0924-6495 (ISSN-L)
- 1572-8641
- OpenAlex
- W2009437443
- Cited by
- 338
- References
- 132
- FWCI
- 16.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nudge Versus Boost: How Coherent are Policy and Theory? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11023-015-9367-9
- The paper
- Grüne-Yanoff, T., & Hertwig, R. (2016). Nudge Versus Boost: How Coherent are Policy and Theory? Minds and Machines. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-015-9367-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
