Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 82

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Selective Versus Unselective Romantic Desire: Not All Reciprocity Is Created Equal

Eastwick, Paul W., Finkel, Eli J., Mochon, Daniel, Ariely, Dan·2007·Psychological Science

Abstract

It is well established in non-romantic contexts that people tend to like individuals who like them (Kenny, 1994); in fact, such reciprocity of liking emerges even when individuals first meet for only a few minutes (Chapdelaine, Kenny, & LaFontana, 1994). Textbooks and common psychological lore frequently extend these findings to romantic liking, but the validity of this extension is unclear. There is indeed evidence that, when asked to recall a falling-in-love experience, individuals often report learning of another’s affection shortly before developing passionate feelings in return (Aron, Dutton, Aron, & Iverson, 1989). Nevertheless, such retrospections can be misleading. Moreover, the opposite hypothesis—that potential romantic partners who play “hard to get ” are desirable and individuals who demonstrate unconcealed romantic interest seem desperate and unappealing—is also likely (for discussion, see Walster, Walster, Piliavin, & Schmidt, 1973). One useful perspective on reciprocity derives from David Kenny’s Social Relations Model (Kenny, 1994; Kenny & Nasby, 1980). This model distinguishes between two independent components: Dyadic reciprocity, which refers to liking that is shared uniquely between two individuals, and generalized reciprocity, which refers to the tendency for people who generally

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01897.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. 10.1177/0265407589063001 · DOI
  2. 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1037/0022-3514.67.1.83 · DOI
  4. 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2006.00146.x · DOI
  5. 10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00013.x-i1 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/0022-1031(77)90050-6 · DOI
  7. 10.1017/CBO9780511499845 · DOI
  8. Kenny D.A., 1994, Interpersonal perception: A social relations analysis
  9. 10.1037/0022-3514.38.2.249 · DOI
  10. 10.1037/h0034234 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Eastwick, P. W., Finkel, E. J., Mochon, D., & Ariely, D.
Affiliations
  • Northwestern University
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Venue
Psychological Science
Published
2007-04
Volume
18
Issue
4
Pages
317-319
ISSN
  • 0956-7976
  • 1467-9280
Cited by
82
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.