Cited by 125Attachment and Relationship DynamicsMarriage and Sexual RelationshipsEvolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior

Intimately connected: The importance of partner responsiveness for experiencing sexual desire.

Birnbaum, Gurit E., Reis, Harry T., Mizrahi, Moran, Kanat-Maymon, Yaniv, Sass, Omri, Granovski-Milner, Chen·2016·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

Sexual desire tends to subside gradually over time, with many couples failing to maintain desire in their long-term relationships. Three studies employed complementary methodologies to examine whether partner responsiveness, an intimacy-building behavior, could instill desire for one's partner. In Study 1, participants were led to believe that they would interact online with their partner. In reality, they interacted with either a responsive or an unresponsive confederate. In Study 2, participants interacted face-to-face with their partner, and judges coded their displays of responsiveness and sexual desire. Study 3 used a daily experiences methodology to examine the mechanisms underlying the responsiveness-desire linkage. Overall, responsiveness was associated with increased desire, but more strongly in women. Feeling special and perceived partner mate value explained the responsiveness-desire link, suggesting that responsive partners were seen as making one feel valued as well as better potential mates for anyone and thus as more sexually desirable. (PsycINFO Database Record

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/pspi0000069

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 73 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Birnbaum, G. E., Reis, H. T., Mizrahi, M., Kanat-Maymon, Y., Sass, O., & Granovski-Milner, C.
Affiliations
  • Reichman University (IL)
  • University of Rochester (US)
  • Jacobs Institute (US)
  • Bar-Ilan University (IL)
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
2016-10
Volume
111
Issue
4
Pages
530-546
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W2468848422
Cited by
125
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1
FWCI
14.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Israel Science Foundation (86/10)
  • Binational Science Foundation (2011381)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Marriage and Sexual Relationships
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Keywords
sexual desire, partner responsiveness, intimacy, long-term relationships, mate value, gender differences, online interaction, everyday experience
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Sexual Behavior, Sexual Partners, Spouses, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review