Cited by 39Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeuroendocrine regulation and behaviorEvolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior

The role of the posterior temporal and medial prefrontal cortices in mediating learning from romantic interest and rejection

Open access
Cooper, Jeffrey C., Dunne, Simon, Furey, Teresa, O'Doherty, John P.·2014·Cerebral Cortex

Abstract

Romantic interest or rejection can be powerful incentives not merely for their emotional impact, but for their potential to transform, in a single interaction, what we think we know about another person--or ourselves. Little is known, though, about how the brain computes expectations for, and learns from, real-world romantic signals. In a novel "speed-dating" paradigm, we had participants meet potential romantic partners in a series of 5-min "dates," and decide whether they would be interested in seeing each partner again. Afterward, participants were scanned with functional magnetic resonance imaging while they were told, for the first time, whether that partner was interested in them or rejected them. Expressions of interest and rejection activated regions previously associated with "mentalizing," including the posterior superior temporal sulcus (pSTS) and rostromedial prefrontal cortex (RMPFC); while pSTS responded to differences from the participant's own decision, RMPFC responded to prediction errors from a reinforcement-learning model of personal desirability. Responses in affective regions were also highly sensitive to participants' expectations. Far from being inscrutable, then, responses to romantic expressions seem to involve a quantitative learning process, rooted in distinct sources of expectations, and encoded in neural networks that process both affective value and social beliefs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/cercor/bht102

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Upon learning of one's own desirability, the posterior temporal sulcus, medial prefrontal cortex, anterior insular cortex, and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex are activated; following rejection from a potential romantic interest, the anterior insular cortex and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex are also recruited.

    “Upon learning of one’s own desirability, the posterior temporal sulcus, mPFC, aIC, and the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC) are activated; however, following rejection from a potential romantic interest, the aIC and dACC are also recruited [106,107,108].”

    From The Neurobiology of Love and Pair Bonding from Human and Animal Perspectives (2023) · cites this paper as [106]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cooper, J. C., Dunne, S., Furey, T., & O'Doherty, J. P.
Affiliations
  • California Institute of Technology (US)
  • Trinity College (CA)
Corresponding author
Cooper, Jeffrey C.
Venue
Cerebral Cortex
Published
2013-04-18
Volume
24
Issue
9
Pages
2502-2511
ISSN
  • 1047-3211 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2199
OpenAlex
W2142835174
Cited by
39
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4
FWCI
1.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cerebral Cortex (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
  • Wellcome Trust (WT087388AIA, 087388)
  • Irish Research Council
  • National Institutes of Health (5t32mh020006-19)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (T32MH020006), P50MH094258)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Keywords
romantic interest, romantic rejection, social learning, posterior superior temporal sulcus, mentalization, prediction error, reinforcement learning, social expectations, speed dating
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Brain Mapping, Decision Making, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Learning, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Models, Psychological, Sexual Behavior, Social Perception, Temporal Lobe, Prefrontal Cortex, Feedback, Psychological, Young Adult, Theory of Mind

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review