Cited by 461Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchResilience and Mental HealthCancer survivorship and care

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Does Self-Reported Posttraumatic Growth Reflect Genuine Positive Change?

Abstract

In this study, we evaluated the validity of self-reported posttraumatic growth (PTG) by assessing the relation between perceived growth and actual growth from pre- to posttrauma. Undergraduate students completed measures tapping typical PTG domains at Time 1 and Time 2 (2 months later). We compared change in those measures with scores on the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory (PTGI; Tedeschi & Calhoun, 1996 ) for those participants who reported a traumatic event between Time 1 and Time 2 ( n = 122). PTGI scores generally were unrelated to actual growth in PTG-related domains. Moreover, perceived growth was associated with increased distress from pre- to posttrauma, whereas actual growth was related to decreased distress, a pattern suggesting that perceived and actual growth reflect different processes. Finally, perceived (but not actual) growth was related to positive reinterpretation coping. Thus, the PTGI, and perhaps other retrospective measures, does not appear to measure actual pre- to posttrauma change.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02381.x

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 44 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Kubany E., 2004, Traumatic Life Events Questionnaire and PTSD Screening and Diagnostic Scale
  2. 10.1037/0022-3514.82.1.112 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1037/0022-3514.79.3.327 · DOI
  4. Stone A.A. (2005, April). Real-time ePRO data collected using eDiaries: Comparisons to recall-based measures of change. Paper presented at the Drug Information Association conference on Benefits and Challenges With ePRO, Arlington, VA.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 461

Metadata

Authors
Frazier, P., Tennen, H., Gavian, M., Park, C., Tomich, P., & Tashiro, T.
Affiliations
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • University of Connecticut (US)
  • Kent State University (US)
  • University of Colorado Boulder (US)
Corresponding author
Frazier, Patricia
Venue
Psychological Science
Published
2009-07
Volume
20
Issue
7
Pages
912-919
ISSN
  • 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9280
OpenAlex
W2079286588
Cited by
460
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 24
FWCI
22.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Keywords
posttraumatic growth, self-report validity, Posttraumatic Growth Inventory, traumatic events, psychological distress, undergraduate students, measurement validity
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Female, Humans, Life Change Events, Male, Perception, Personal Satisfaction, Prospective Studies, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Mental Recall, Self Disclosure, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Stress, Psychological, Students, United States, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review