Cited by 37Spinal Cord Injury ResearchCancer survivorship and careResilience and Mental Health

Perceived posttraumatic growth and depreciation after spinal cord injury: Actual or illusory?

Open access
Kunz, Simon, Joseph, Stephen, Geyh, Szilvia, Peter, Claudio·2019·Health Psychology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study examined whether retrospective reports of posttraumatic growth (PTG) and depreciation (PTD) of individuals recently diagnosed with a spinal cord injury (SCI) coincide with prospectively measured changes in the conceptually close domains of general self-efficacy (SE) and purpose in life (PIL). The study also tested whether PTG/D and changes in SE and PIL independently predict psychological adjustment to the injury (depressive symptoms, anxiety, life satisfaction). METHOD: Adopting a longitudinal design, a sample of 206 newly injured patients admitted to one of the four Swiss SCI rehabilitation centers was analyzed. SE and PIL were assessed one month after injury diagnosis and at rehabilitation discharge, PTG/D and the adjustment indicators only at discharge. Structural equation modeling was used to calculate latent change scores for SE and PIL, to correlate these scores to PTG/D scores, and to regress the adjustment indicators on both of them. RESULTS: PTG/D scores were weakly (rmax = .20, p = .033) correlated to changes in SE and PIL. In the multivariate analyses, positive changes in SE and PIL and PTG scores were all associated with better adjustment (e.g., fewer depressive symptoms). In contrast, PTD scores were related to lower adjustment. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that PTG/D in the initial time after a potentially traumatic medical event seem to be illusory to some degree, as indicated by their weak association with "actual" (i.e., longitudinally measured) changes. Nevertheless, both, PTG/D and actual changes, need to be considered by researchers and clinicians, as they seem to be independently related to psychological adjustment. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/hea0000676

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kunz, S., Joseph, S., Geyh, S., & Peter, C.
Affiliations
  • Swiss Paraplegic Research (CH)
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
Venue
Health Psychology
Published
2019-01
Volume
38
Issue
1
Pages
53-62
ISSN
  • 0278-6133 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-7810
OpenAlex
W2899363760
Cited by
37
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 3
FWCI
3.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Health Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Swiss National Science Foundation (100014_149284)
  • Swiss Spinal Cord Injury Cohort Study
  • Swiss Paraplegic Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Spinal Cord Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
Keywords
posttraumatic growth, spinal cord injury, general self-efficacy, meaning of life, psychological adjustment, depressive symptoms, anxiety, life satisfaction, rehabilitation
MeSH terms
Posttraumatic Growth, Psychological, Anxiety, Depreciation, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Spinal Cord Injuries

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review